Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 10:10:720.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00720. eCollection 2020.

Comparison Between PET-CT-Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations

Comparison Between PET-CT-Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Fengjie Zhu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT-guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC. Methods: Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates. Results: Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (p = 0.583). Conclusions: Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.

Keywords: PET-CT; early stage tongue cancer; elective neck dissection; survival analysis; tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of regional control between the two groups (p = 0.731).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of disease-specific survival between the two groups (p = 0.583).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. D'Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N, Dandekar M, Gupta S, Hawaldar R, Agarwal JP, et al. . Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:521–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1506007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abu-Ghanem S, Yehuda M, Carmel NN, Leshno M, Abergel A, Gutfeld O, et al. . Elective neck dissection vs observation in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue with no clinically apparent lymph node metastasis in the neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2016) 142:857–65. 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1281 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu JY, Chen CF, Bai CH. Elective neck dissection versus observation in early-stage (cT1/T2N0) Oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. (2019) 4:554–61. 10.1002/lio2.301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canis M, Plüquett S, Ihler F, Matthias C, Kron M, Steiner W. Impact of elective neck dissection vs observation on regional recurrence and survival in cN0-staged patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2012) 138:650–5. 10.1001/archoto.2012.1026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borgemeester MC, van den Brekel MW, van Tinteren H, Smeele LE, Pameijer FA, van Velthuysen ML, et al. . Ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of the clinically N0 neck: factors influencing its accuracy. Head Neck. (2008) 30:1505–13. 10.1002/hed.20903 - DOI - PubMed