Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jun 26;15(6):e0234481.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234481. eCollection 2020.

Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: Do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?

Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin  1 , Niyazi Emre Turgut  1 , Meral Gultomruk  2 , Selen Ecemis  1 , Zalihe Yarkiner  3 , Necati Findikli  2   4 , Mustafa Bahceci  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: Do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?

Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Is freeze-all strategy effective in terms of cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in all patients?

Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed the CLBRs of 2523 patients undergoing fresh or electively frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. In 1047, cycles, the fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy was applied for the 1st ET, whereas electively frozen ET (e-FET) was performed in 1476 cycles. Female age ≤ 37 and blastocysts frozen via vitrification were included. The patients in each arm were further stratified into four subgroups according to the number of oocytes retrieved as follows: Group A: 1-5, group B: 6-10, group C: 11-15 and group D: 16-25 oocytes retrieved. The primary endpoint was the CLBR. The secondary endpoints were the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate and the live birth rates (LBRs) following fresh ETs and e-FETs for the first transfers.

Result(s): The CLBR was similar between the fresh ET and e-FET arms in group A (35/76 (46.1%) vs 29/67 (43.3%), p = 0.74) and group B (165/275 (60%) vs 216/324 (66.7%), p = 0.091), whereas significantly higher rates were detected in favor of the e-FET arm within group C (328/460 (71.3%) vs 201/348 (57.8%), p<0.001) and group D (227/348 (65.2%), vs 446/625 (71.5%), p<0.001). The OHSS rate was also found to be higher in the fresh ET arm among group C (12/348 (3.4%) vs 0/460 (0%), p<0.001) and group D (38/348 (10.9%) vs 3/625 (0.5%), p<0.001) patients than e-FET arm. Perinatal and obstetrical outcomes were nonsignificantly different between fresh and e-FET arms. However, the birth weights were significantly lower for fresh ET, 3064 versus 3201 g for singletons (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Compared with a fresh-transfer strategy, the e-FET strategy resulted in a higher CLBR among patients with >10 oocytes retrieved during stimulated cycles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors FKB, NET, MG, SE, NF and MB are employees of Bahceci Health Group. ZY is an employee of Cyprus Science University. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cobo A, de los Santos MJ, Castello D, Gamiz P, Campos P, et al. (2012) Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril 98: 1138–1146 e1131. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devroey P, Adriaensen P (2011) OHSS Free Clinic. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 3: 43–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blockeel C, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H (2016) A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis. Hum Reprod 31: 491–497. 10.1093/humrep/dev339 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sha T, Yin X, Cheng W, Massey IY (2018) Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 109: 330–342 e339. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. (2018) Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? Hum Reprod Update 24: 35–58. 10.1093/humupd/dmx031 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types