Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20152.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020152.

Prediction of no-reflow phenomenon in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Prediction of no-reflow phenomenon in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Li Yang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

No-reflow is an important complication among patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).A retrospective study of 1658 STEMI patients undergoing direct PCI was performed. Patients were randomly assigned at a 7:3 ratio into development cohort and validation cohort and into no-reflow and normal blood flow groups. Clinical data and laboratory examinations were compared to identify independent risk factors and establish a no-reflow risk scoring system.In the development cohort (n = 1122), 331 (29.5%) had no-reflow. Multivariate analysis showed age ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.766, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.313-2.376, P < .001), not using angiotonase inhibitor/angiotensin receptor antagonists (OR = 1.454, 95%CI: 1.084-1.951, P = .013), collateral circulation <grade 2 (OR = 3.056, 95%CI: 1.566-5.961, P = .001), thrombosis burden ≥4 points (OR = 2.033, 95%CI: 1.370-3.018, P < .001), diameter of target lesion ≥3.5 mm (OR = 1.511, 95%CI: 1.087-2.100, P = .014), thrombosis aspiration (OR = 1.422, 95%CI: 1.042-1.941, P = .026), and blood glucose >8 mmol/L (OR = 1.386, 95%CI: 1.007-1.908, P = .045) were related to no-reflow. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve was 0.648 (95%CI: 0.609-0.86). At 0.349 cutoff sensitivity was 42.0%, specificity was 79.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 44.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 77.4%, P < .001. The resulting risk scoring system was tested in the validation cohort (n = 536), with 30.1% incidence of no-reflow. The area under the ROC curve was 0.637 (95%CI: 0.582-0.692). At a cutoff of 0.349 sensitivity was 53.2% and specificity was 66.7%, PPV was 41.2%, NPV was 76.4%, P < .001.The no-reflow risk scoring system was effective in identifying high-risk patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of factors related to no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction identified by multivariate logistic regression in the development cohort. Cutoff = 0.349, sensitivity: 42.0%, specificity: 79.3%, PPV: 44.7%, NPV: 77.4%, P < .001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of factors related to no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction identified by multivariate logistic regression in the development cohort. When cutoff = 0.349, sensitivity: 53.2%, specificity: 66.7%, PPV: 41.2%, NPV: 76.4%, P < .001.

References

    1. Okwuosa IS, Lewsey SC, Adesiyun T, et al. Worldwide disparities in cardiovascular disease: challenges and solutions. Int J Cardiol 2016;202:433–40. - PubMed
    1. Li H, Ge J. Cardiovascular diseases in China: current status and future perspectives. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015;6:25–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li J, Li X, Wang Q, et al. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011 (the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study): a retrospective analysis of hospital data. Lancet 2015;385:441–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Marino P. Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an overview of current status. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2008;50:352–82. - PubMed
    1. Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, et al. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:281–92. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms