Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;21(12):1035-1041.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002437.

Gender and Authorship in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Control Trials

Affiliations

Gender and Authorship in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Control Trials

Grace M Xu et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the gender distribution of authorship of pediatric critical care randomized control trials.

Data sources: The 415 randomized control trials in pediatric critical care published before 2019.

Study selection: We included all randomized control trials enrolling children in a PICU. We used PICUtrials.net, which uses comprehensive search strategies of multiple databases, to identify published randomized control trials.

Data extraction: We manually extracted the name and profession of each listed author from each publication and classified each author as male or female based on their name.

Results: We included 2,146 authors and were able to classify 1,888 (88%) as men or women. Overall, 38% of authors were women, this varied with the authorship position: 37% of first, 38% of middle, and 25% of last authors were women (p < 0.001). The three most common professions were physician (63%), nonclinician (11%), and nurse (6%)-of which 30%, 45%, and 97%, respectively, were women. The percentage of female authorship overall has increased from 28% in 1985-1989 to 39% in 2015-2018 (p for trend = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the characteristics of randomized control trials published with a female first or last author versus those with both male first and last authors with respect to the median number of children randomized (60 vs. 50; p = 0.41), multicentred trials (17% vs. 24%; p = 0.12), trials at low risk of bias (50% vs. 66%; p = 0.26), reporting any funding (55% vs. 51%; p = 0.66), or median number of citations per year (1.5 vs. 2.4; p = 0.09).

Conclusions: Although increasing over time, the percentage of researchers publishing pediatric critical care randomized control trials who are women still lags behind the percentage clinicians who are women. Trials that female researchers publish are similar in characteristics and impact as male researchers. Further work should identify barriers to gender diversity and potential solutions in pediatric critical care research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Better Is Not Good Enough.
    Carlton EF, Gaies M, Dewan M. Carlton EF, et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;21(12):1081-1108. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002489. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33278212 No abstract available.

References

    1. Amrein K, Langmann A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, et al. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend Med. 2011; 8:378–387
    1. Sege R, Nykiel-Bub L, Selk S. Sex differences in institutional support for junior biomedical researchers. JAMA. 2015; 314:1175–1177
    1. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, et al. Sex differences in academic rank in US Medical schools in 2014. JAMA. 2015; 314:1149–1158
    1. Tamblyn R, Girard N, Qian CJ, et al. Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada. CMAJ. 2018; 190:E489–E499
    1. Maxwell AR, Riley CL, Stalets EL, et al. State of the unit: Physician gender diversity in pediatric critical care medicine leadership. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019; 20:e362–e365

LinkOut - more resources