Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;26(4):2549-2555.
doi: 10.1007/s12253-020-00856-6. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

The Prognostic Value of PARP Expression in High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Affiliations

The Prognostic Value of PARP Expression in High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Szabolcs Molnár et al. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

In an attempt to clarify the prognostic relevance of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression, we analysed the clinical data of 86 high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases in which PARP immunohistochemistry results were available. Immunostaining to highlight PARP protein expression was performed using a Leica Bond MAX Immunostainer (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). We applied a rabbit polyclonal anti-PARP antibody (ab6079 330, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for the specific reaction. The intensity and distribution of immunostaining were assessed by light microscopy (Leica DM2500 microscope, DFC 420 camera, and Leica Application Suite V3 software; Leica) and evaluated with a four-grade (0-3+) system. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was generated for each semiquantitative group of PARP expression among chemotherapy-naive cases at the time of PARP immunohistochemistry. Eighty-six cases were chemotherapy-naive at the time of PARP immunohistochemistry, and 41 cases showed no PARP expression. Forty-five cases showed intermediate or high PARP expression. The median PFS among patients in the PARP-negative group was 16 months (interquartile range; IQR 10.7-35.9 months), and the median PFS of patients in the PARP-positive group was 12 months (IQR 6.1-21.8 months). The difference was significant according to the log-rank test (p = 0.01). The median overall survival (OS) of patients in the PARP-negative group was 65 months (IQR 43.6-110.8 months), and the median OS of patients in the PARP-positive group was 52 months (IQR 36.9-66.7 months). The difference was significant according to the log-rank test (p = 0.028). Multiple comparisons confirmed that PARP expression results in a significant difference in PFS and OS achieved by first-line Taxol-carboplatin chemotherapy. The lack of PARP expression assessed by immunohistochemistry may predict improved PFS in ovarian cancer patients after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy.

Keywords: Gynaecological oncology; Ovarian cancer; PARP expression; Platinum-based chemotherapy; Progression-free survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The intensity of specific immunolabelling was determined using a four-grade (0–3+) system, where 0 was equivalent to the total lack of staining (image “a”) and 3+ represented stable and uniform nuclear positivity in the tumour cells (image “c”). We gave a 2+ score in cases of evident positivity appearing weaker than the maximal intensity (image “b”)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The median PFS among patients in the PARP-negative group was 16 months (interquartile range; IQR 10.7–35.9 months), and the median PFS of patients in the PARP-positive group was 12 months (IQR 6.1–21.8 months). The difference was significant according to the log-rank test (p = 0.01). The median OS of patients in the PARP-negative group was 65 months (IQR 43.6–110.8 months), and the median OS of patients in the PARP-positive group was 52 months (IQR 36.9–66.7 months). The difference was significant according to the log-rank test (p = 0.028)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ataseven B, Grimm C, Harter P, Prader S, Traut A, Heitz F, du Bois A. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hacker NF, Rao A (2016) Surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1–17 - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Bohlke K, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Cliby WA, Coleman RL, Dizon DS, Kash JJ, Meyer LA, Moore KN, Olawaiye AB, Oldham J, Salani R, Sparacio D, Tew WP, Vergote I, Edelson MI. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sammartino P, Biacchi D, Di Giorgio A. Letters to the editor how to improve cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and talk about it in a common language. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:433–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finch A, Shaw P, Rosen B, Murphy J, Narod SA, Colgan TJ. Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo- oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:58–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.065. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms