Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 17:7:2333392820932324.
doi: 10.1177/2333392820932324. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

After Less Than 2 Months, the Simulations That Drove the World to Strict Lockdown Appear to be Wrong, the Same of the Policies They Generated

Affiliations

After Less Than 2 Months, the Simulations That Drove the World to Strict Lockdown Appear to be Wrong, the Same of the Policies They Generated

Alberto Boretti. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Here, we review modeling predictions for Covid-19 mortality based on recent data. The Imperial College model trusted by the British Government predicted peak mortalities above 170 deaths per million in the United States, and above 215 deaths per million in Great Britain, after more than 2 months from the outbreak, and a length for the outbreak well above 4 months. These predictions drove the world to adopt harsh distancing measures and forget the concept of herd immunity. China had peak mortalities of less than 0.1 deaths per million after 40 days since first deaths, and an 80-day-long outbreak. Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, or Great Britain flattened the curve at 13.6, 28.6, 9.0, 10.6, and 13.9 deaths per million after 40, 39, 33, 44, and 39 days from first deaths, or 31, 29, 24, 38, and 29 days since the daily confirmed deaths reached 0.1 per million people, respectively. The declining curve is much slower for Italy, the Netherlands, or Great Britain than Belgium or Sweden. Opposite to Great Britain, Italy, or Belgium that enforced a complete lockdown, the Netherlands only adopted an "intelligent" lockdown, and Sweden did not adopt any lockdown. However, they achieved better results. Coupled to new evidence for minimal impact of Covid-19 on the healthy population, with the most part not infected even if challenged, or only mild or asymptomatic if infected, there are many good reasons to question the validity of the specific epidemiological model simulations and the policies they produced. Fewer restrictions on the healthy while better protecting the vulnerable would have been a much better option, permitting more sustainable protection of countries otherwise at risk of second waves as soon as the strict measures are lifted.

Keywords: Covid-19; infectious diseases; modeling; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Daily mortalities per million from countries in Europe, the United States, and Canada, plus South Korea, Australia, and Saudi Arabia, (B) total mortalities from China, of population 1.5 billion people. Images reproduced from https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data. C, Nondimensional daily mortalities per million from selected countries since daily deaths were first reported. The values are normalized versus the peak value. D, Daily mortalities per million from the same selected countries since daily deaths were first reported. Data from the European Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A, Computations of the death rate from the study by Adam for Great Britain and the United States. Data digitized from the study by Adam and Ferguson et al., B and C, Comparison of these results with the simple SIR model having the listed parameters.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A and B, Daily mortality rate per million of Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Great Britain, and comparison with the model predictions, and the SIR simulations of parameters shown.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Daily mortality rate per million of Great Britain and comparison with the model predictions, and the SIR simulations of parameters.

References

    1. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A. 1927;115(772):700–721.
    1. Anderson RM, May RM. Population biology of infectious diseases: part I. Nature. 1979;280(5721):361–367. - PubMed
    1. Smith D, Moore L. The SIR model for spread of disease: the differential equation model. Convergence. 2004. www.maa.org/press/periodicals/loci/joma/the-sir-model-for-spread-of-dise.... Accessed April 29, 2020.
    1. Murray JD. Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction (Vol. 17). Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
    1. Han XN, De Vlas SJ, Fang LQ, Feng D, Cao WC, Habbema JDF. Mathematical modelling of SARS and other infectious diseases in China: a review. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(suppl 1):92–100. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources