Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
- PMID: 32596531
- PMCID: PMC7294696
- DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167
Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs
Erratum in
-
ERRATUM.Int J Bioprint. 2020 Sep 17;6(4):309. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i4.309. eCollection 2020. Int J Bioprint. 2020. PMID: 33102924 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called "bioink," that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a "scaffold-free" version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a "hybrid" approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering.
Keywords: Tissue engineering; bioprinting; scaffold-free; scaffolds.
Copyright: © 2019 N I. Moldovan , et al.
Figures
References
-
- Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick J A, et al. 2017, Biofabrication:A guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol. 36(4):384–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015. - PubMed
-
- Atala A, Yoo J. 2015, Essentials of 3D Biofabrication and Translation. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
-
- Mironov V. 2005, The second international workshop on bioprinting, biopatterning and bioassembly. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 5(8):1111–1115. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.5.8.1111. - PubMed
-
- Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, et al. 2016, Biofabrication:Reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication. 8(1):13001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52. - PubMed
-
- Yu Y, Zhang Y, Ozbolat IT. 2016, Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands”as a new bioink. Sci Rep. 6:2∊. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2∊. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources