Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 26;5(1):167.
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v5i1.167. eCollection 2019.

Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs

Affiliations
Review

Of balls, inks and cages: Hybrid biofabrication of 3D tissue analogs

Nicanor I Moldovan et al. Int J Bioprint. .

Erratum in

  • ERRATUM.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Int J Bioprint. 2020 Sep 17;6(4):309. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i4.309. eCollection 2020. Int J Bioprint. 2020. PMID: 33102924 Free PMC article.

Abstract

The overarching principle of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is the placing of cells or cell clusters in the 3D space to generate a cohesive tissue microarchitecture that comes close to in vivo characteristics. To achieve this goal, several technical solutions are available, generating considerable combinatorial bandwidth: (i) Support structures are generated first, and cells are seeded subsequently; (ii) alternatively, cells are delivered in a printing medium, so-called "bioink," that contains them during the printing process and ensures shape fidelity of the generated structure; and (iii) a "scaffold-free" version of bioprinting, where only cells are used and the extracellular matrix is produced by the cells themselves, also recently entered a phase of accelerated development and successful applications. However, the scaffold-free approaches may still benefit from secondary incorporation of scaffolding materials, thus expanding their versatility. Reversibly, the bioink-based bioprinting could also be improved by adopting some of the principles and practices of scaffold-free biofabrication. Collectively, we anticipate that combinations of these complementary methods in a "hybrid" approach, rather than their development in separate technological niches, will largely increase their efficiency and applicability in tissue engineering.

Keywords: Tissue engineering; bioprinting; scaffold-free; scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphic overview of the biofabrication methods.

References

    1. Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick J A, et al. 2017, Biofabrication:A guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol. 36(4):384–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015. - PubMed
    1. Atala A, Yoo J. 2015, Essentials of 3D Biofabrication and Translation. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
    1. Mironov V. 2005, The second international workshop on bioprinting, biopatterning and bioassembly. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 5(8):1111–1115. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.5.8.1111. - PubMed
    1. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, et al. 2016, Biofabrication:Reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication. 8(1):13001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52. - PubMed
    1. Yu Y, Zhang Y, Ozbolat IT. 2016, Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free “tissue strands”as a new bioink. Sci Rep. 6:2∊. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2∊. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources