Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 9;5(24):14555-14563.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01261. eCollection 2020 Jun 23.

Grazing Incidence X-ray Diffraction Studies of Lipid-Peptide Mixed Monolayers during Shear Flow

Affiliations

Grazing Incidence X-ray Diffraction Studies of Lipid-Peptide Mixed Monolayers during Shear Flow

Pradip K Bera et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD) studies of monolayers of biomolecules at an air-water interface give quantitative information of in-plane packing, coherence length of crystalline domains, etc. Rheo-GIXD measurements can reveal quantitative changes in the nanocrystalline domains of a monolayer under shear. Here, we report GIXD studies of monolayers of alamethicin peptide, DPPC lipid, and their mixtures at an air-water interface under steady shear stress. The alamethicin monolayer and the mixed monolayer show a flow jamming transition. On the other hand, the pure 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) monolayer under constant stress flows steadily with a notable enhancement of the area/molecule and coherence lengths, suggesting the fusion of nanocrystallites during flow. The DPPC-alamethicin mixed monolayer shows no significant change in the area/DPPC molecule, but the coherence lengths of the individual phases (DPPC and alamethicin) increase, suggesting that the crystallites of individual phases grow bigger by merging of domains. More phase separation occurs in the system during flow. Our results show that rheo-GIXD has the potential to explore in situ molecular structural changes under rheological conditions for a diverse range of confined biomolecules at interfaces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the in situ rheo-GIXD setup, showing the water-filled IRS cell on the rheometer’s Peltier base, the position of the bi-cone on the interface, and the path of the X-ray beam through the Kapton window striking the annular-shaped interface (top). (Bottom left) schematic of the GIXD mechanism: the vertical incidence angle (αi), the horizontal scattering angle (2θ), and the vertical exit angle (α); in-plane wave vector qxy ≃ (4π/λ) sin (2θ/2) and out-of-plane wave vector qz = (2π/λ) (sin α + sin αi) are shown. (Bottom right) photograph of the experimental setup showing the X-ray source, the rheometer on a z-stage, and the detector assembly attached to the goniometer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
GIXD intensity contours in the (qxy, qz) plane and Bragg peaks (I vs qxy) of the three monolayers, (a) alamethicin, (b) DPPC, and (c) DPPC–alamethicin, are shown under no-shear conditions at 285 K. Solid lines are fits using a Voigt function. In (c), for the bottom Bragg peak, the solid line is the resultant fit with two peaks (blue dotted line and red shaded black dotted line). Color bars represent intensity values in contours.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow curve, shear stress (σ) vs shear rate (γ̇), obtained in the controlled shear stress (CSS) mode with a waiting time of 30 s for each data point is shown for the DPPC monolayer and DPPC–alamethicin mixed monolayer at the air–water interface. Solid lines are of slope ∼1. The dotted line is the approximate cutoff of the linear flow region (∼250 μPa·m).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rheo-GIXD creep data of the alamethicin monolayer (presheared for 200 s followed by a waiting time of 300 s before each measurement; see text): (a) creep curves; shear rate (γ̇) vs time (t) (applied stress σ is mentioned close to the curves), (b) Bragg peaks (I vs qxy) for different σ values. Solid lines are fits using a Voigt function. The Bragg peak corresponds to the helix pitch of alamethicin. (c) The helix pitch (p) and the coherence length (Lp) are plotted vs σ. Straight horizontal lines represent the average values of p and Lp.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Rheo-GIXD creep data of the DPPC monolayer (presheared for 200 s followed by a waiting time of 300 s before each measurement; see text): (a) creep curves; γ̇ vs t are plotted. Bragg peaks q02 (bottom) and q11 (top) for different σ values of (b) 10 μPa·m, (c) 20 μPa·m, (d) 50 μPa·m, (e) and 100 μPa·m are shown. The peaks are fitted using a Voigt function.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Rheo-GIXD creep data of the DPPC–alamethicin mixed monolayer with the molar ratio P/L = 1:2 (presheared for 200 s followed by a waiting time of 300 s before each measurement; see text): (a) creep curves; γ̇ vs t are plotted. Bragg peaks q02 (blue solid fit) and q11 (black solid fit) and the alamethicin helix peak (red solid fit) for different σ values of (b) 25 μPa·m, (c) 50 μPa·m, (d) 75 μPa·m, and (e) 150 μPa·m are shown. The peaks are fitted using a Voigt function.
Figure 7
Figure 7
qz-integrated intensity vs qxy plot for the monolayers during creep flow. The diffraction data from the clean buffer subphase surface are also shown.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Area/molecule of DPPC (Amolecule) and the coherence lengths L02 (b) and L11 (c) corresponding to the Bragg peaks for pure DPPC (open circles) and DPPC–alamethicin mixed (red squares) monolayers are plotted against σ. Dotted curves are guides to the eyes.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Comprehensive Approach to the Interpretation of the Electrical Properties of Film-Forming Molecules.
    Chachaj-Brekiesz A, Kobierski J, Griñón Echaniz R, Wnętrzak A, Dynarowicz-Latka P. Chachaj-Brekiesz A, et al. J Phys Chem B. 2022 Sep 15;126(36):7037-7046. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04526. Epub 2022 Sep 2. J Phys Chem B. 2022. PMID: 36054662 Free PMC article.
  • The Structure of Oxysterols Determines Their Behavior at Phase Boundaries: Implications for Model Membranes and Structure-Activity Relationships.
    Wnętrzak A, Chachaj-Brekiesz A, Kobierski J, Dynarowicz-Latka P. Wnętrzak A, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1440:3-29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43883-7_1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38036872 Review.
  • X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano-Bio Interface.
    Sanchez-Cano C, Alvarez-Puebla RA, Abendroth JM, Beck T, Blick R, Cao Y, Caruso F, Chakraborty I, Chapman HN, Chen C, Cohen BE, Conceição ALC, Cormode DP, Cui D, Dawson KA, Falkenberg G, Fan C, Feliu N, Gao M, Gargioni E, Glüer CC, Grüner F, Hassan M, Hu Y, Huang Y, Huber S, Huse N, Kang Y, Khademhosseini A, Keller TF, Körnig C, Kotov NA, Koziej D, Liang XJ, Liu B, Liu S, Liu Y, Liu Z, Liz-Marzán LM, Ma X, Machicote A, Maison W, Mancuso AP, Megahed S, Nickel B, Otto F, Palencia C, Pascarelli S, Pearson A, Peñate-Medina O, Qi B, Rädler J, Richardson JJ, Rosenhahn A, Rothkamm K, Rübhausen M, Sanyal MK, Schaak RE, Schlemmer HP, Schmidt M, Schmutzler O, Schotten T, Schulz F, Sood AK, Spiers KM, Staufer T, Stemer DM, Stierle A, Sun X, Tsakanova G, Weiss PS, Weller H, Westermeier F, Xu M, Yan H, Zeng Y, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zhu D, Zhu Y, Parak WJ. Sanchez-Cano C, et al. ACS Nano. 2021 Mar 23;15(3):3754-3807. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c09563. Epub 2021 Mar 2. ACS Nano. 2021. PMID: 33650433 Free PMC article.
  • Crystallization of Poly(ethylene)s with Regular Phosphoester Defects Studied at the Air-Water Interface.
    Hasan N, Busse K, Haider T, Wurm FR, Kressler J. Hasan N, et al. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Oct 19;12(10):2408. doi: 10.3390/polym12102408. Polymers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33086637 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Als-Nielsen J.; Jacquemain D.; Kjaer K.; Leveiller F.; Lahav M.; Leiserowitz L. Principles and applications of grazing incidence X-ray and neutron scattering from ordered molecular monolayers at the air–water interface. Phys. Rep. 1994, 246, 251–313. 10.1016/0370-1573(94)90046-9. - DOI
    1. Kaganer V. M.; Möhwald H.; Dutta P. Structure and phase transitions in Langmuir monolayers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, 779–819. 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.779. - DOI
    1. Fuller G. G.; Vermant J. Complex fluid-fluid interfaces: rheology and structure. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2012, 3, 519–543. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bera P. K.; Kandar A. K.; Krishnaswamy R.; Sood A. K. Experimental signatures of a nonequilibrium phase transition near the crossover point of a Langmuir monolayer. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2019, 31, 50400410.1088/1361-648X/ab4235. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjaer K.; Als-Nielsen J.; Helm C. A.; Laxhuber L. A.; Möhwald H. Ordering in lipid monolayers studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction and fluorescence microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 2224–2227. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2224. - DOI - PubMed