Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Sep;60(9):1977-1986.
doi: 10.1111/trf.15935. Epub 2020 Jun 28.

Machine learning-based prediction of transfusion

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Machine learning-based prediction of transfusion

Andreas Mitterecker et al. Transfusion. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The ability to predict transfusions arising during hospital admission might enable economized blood supply management and might furthermore increase patient safety by ensuring a sufficient stock of red blood cells (RBCs) for a specific patient. We therefore investigated the precision of four different machine learning-based prediction algorithms to predict transfusion, massive transfusion, and the number of transfusions in patients admitted to a hospital.

Study design and methods: This was a retrospective, observational study in three adult tertiary care hospitals in Western Australia between January 2008 and June 2017. Primary outcome measures for the classification tasks were the area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristics curve, the F1 score, and the average precision of the four machine learning algorithms used: neural networks (NNs), logistic regression (LR), random forests (RFs), and gradient boosting (GB) trees.

Results: Using our four predictive models, transfusion of at least 1 unit of RBCs could be predicted rather accurately (sensitivity for NN, LR, RF, and GB: 0.898, 0.894, 0.584, and 0.872, respectively; specificity: 0.958, 0.966, 0.964, 0.965). Using the four methods for prediction of massive transfusion was less successful (sensitivity for NN, LR, RF, and GB: 0.780, 0.721, 0.002, and 0.797, respectively; specificity: 0.994, 0.995, 0.993, 0.995). As a consequence, prediction of the total number of packed RBCs transfused was also rather inaccurate.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the necessity for intrahospital transfusion can be forecasted reliably, however the amount of RBC units transfused during a hospital stay is more difficult to predict.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Transfusion of at least 1 RBC unit. Transfusion of at least 1 RBC unit. A, ROC curves for the different methods. B, Precision‐recall curve for the different methods [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Massive transfusion. Prediction of massive transfusion. A, ROC curves for the different methods. B, Precision‐recall curve for the different methods [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Shander A, Isbister J, Gombotz H. Patient blood management: the global view. Transfusion. 2016;56(suppl 1):S94–S102. - PubMed
    1. Ellingson KD, Sapiano MRP, Haass KA, et al. Continued decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States‐2015. Transfusion. 2017;57(suppl 2):1588–1598. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leahy MF, Hofmann A, Towler S, et al. Improved outcomes and reduced costs associated with a health‐system‐wide patient blood management program: a retrospective observational study in four major adult tertiary‐care hospitals. Transfusion. 2017;57(6):1347–1358. - PubMed
    1. Hofmann A, Farmer S, Towler SC. Strategies to preempt and reduce the use of blood products: an Australian perspective. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25(1):66–73. - PubMed
    1. Shander AS, Goodnough LT. Blood transfusion as a quality indicator in cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2010;304(14):1610–1611. - PubMed