Comparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective study
- PMID: 32597122
- DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2020.2.149
Comparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective study
Abstract
Objectives: Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser lithotripsy is used in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Fragmentation is made with a certain value of pulse energy (Joule) and frequency (Hertz) in Holmium laser lithotripsy and the multiplication of these values gives us total power (Watt). Devices with maximum power of 20 Watt and 30 Watt are used in clinical practice. We want to compare the efficiency, safety and pain scores of the lithotripsy made below 20 Watt and over 30 Watt with 30 Watt laser device.
Materials and methods: 60 patients who had 2-3 cm sized kidney stones and operation planned were prospectively divided into three groups. Groups were random identified. In the first group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Watt power with 20 Watt laser device. In the second group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Watt power with 30 Watt laser device. In the third group, fragmentation was performed over 20 Watt power with 30 Watt laser device. Demographic, stone, intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded. We compared these groups regarding efficiency, safety and pain score.
Results: For demographic and stone data, there was a statistically significant difference only for stone number. For intraoperative and postoperative data, there was a statistically significant difference only for ureteral access sheath usage between the groups. Success was lower than the other groups in Group 1.
Conclusions: Success was higher in groups using 30 Watt laser device. There was not statistically significantly difference between complications and pain. 30 Watt laser device is safe and efficient in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
Similar articles
-
Comparing Thulium Fiber Versus High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy Combined with the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis by the Global FANS Collaborative Group.J Endourol. 2025 Jan;39(1):42-49. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0653. Epub 2024 Dec 16. J Endourol. 2025. PMID: 39676748
-
Second-look Flexible Nephroscopy Combined With Holmium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Lithotripsy Under Local Anesthesia: A Prospective Study.Urology. 2017 Jan;99:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.074. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Urology. 2017. PMID: 27639795
-
Comparative effectiveness of high-power holmium laser lithotripsy for pediatric patients with kidney and ureteral stones.J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Aug;18(4):463.e1-463.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 Jun 2. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 35715329
-
Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.Urol Int. 2009;82(3):356-60. doi: 10.1159/000209372. Epub 2009 May 11. Urol Int. 2009. PMID: 19440028 Review.
-
Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis.Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Apr;15(4):397. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0397-2. Curr Urol Rep. 2014. PMID: 24532341 Review.
Cited by
-
International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery.BJU Int. 2023 Feb;131(2):153-164. doi: 10.1111/bju.15836. Epub 2022 Jul 12. BJU Int. 2023. PMID: 35733358 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources