Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb;12(2):207-216.
doi: 10.1111/jdi.13339. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

Randomized trial of an intensified, multifactorial intervention in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease: Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial of an intensified, multifactorial intervention in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease: Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan)

Kenichi Shikata et al. J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Aims/introduction: We evaluated the efficacy of multifactorial intensive treatment (IT) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

Materials and methods: The Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan (DNETT-Japan) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 5-year follow-up period. We randomly assigned 164 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥300 mg/g creatinine, serum creatinine level 1.2-2.5 mg/dL in men and 1.0-2.5 mg/dL in women) to receive either IT or conventional treatment. The primary composite outcome was end-stage kidney failure, doubling of serum creatinine or death from any cause, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population.

Results: The IT tended to reduce the risk of primary end-points as compared with conventional treatment, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach the statistically significant level (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.11; P = 0.13). Meanwhile, the decrease in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and the use of statin were significantly associated with the decrease in primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.23, P < 0.001 and hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.998, P < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not different between treatment groups.

Conclusions: The risk of kidney events tended to decrease by IT, although it was not statistically significant. Lipid control using statin was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney events. Further follow-up study might show the effect of IT in patients with advanced diabetic kidney disease.

Keywords: Diabetic Nephropathy Remission and Regression Team Trial in Japan; Diabetic kidney disease; Diabetic nephropathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KS received speaker fees from MSD, Eli Lilly Japan, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe and Kyowa Hakko Kirin; research support from Takeda, MSD, Kyowa Hakko Kirin and Mitsubishi Tanabe; and a consulting fee from Daiichi Sankyo. MH has received speaker fees from Astellas, Taisho‐Toyama, Tanabe‐Mitsubishi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taisho, Kowa, Ono, MSD, Novartis and Novo‐Nordisk; and research support from Novo‐Nordisk, Ono, Shionogi and Johnson & Johnson. DK received speaker fees from MSD, Astellas Pharma Inc., Ono, Taisho, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Eli Lilly Japan, Boehringer‐Ingelheim Japan and Novo Nordisk Pharma; and research support from Ono., Taisho, Mitsubishi Tanabe and Boehringer‐Ingelheim Japan. HA received a research grant from Ono and Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH. MN received speaker fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Taisho, Novo Nordisk Pharma and Daiichi Sankyo. HM is a consultant for AbbVie, Teijin and Boehringer‐Ingelheim Japan. TN, YS, SM, DS, TY, TU, DO and SM declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Event‐free survival of primary outcomes (dialysis, doubling of serum creatinine or death) in the randomized patients (full analysis set). The effects of treatment (hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and P‐values) were estimated by using a Cox proportional hazards model. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of trial treatment on each outcome in the randomized patients. The effects of treatment (hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals and P ‐values) were estimated by using a Cox proportional hazards model. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

References

    1. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, et al US renal data system 2013 annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63: A7. - PubMed
    1. de Boer IH, Rue TC, Hall YN, et al Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2011; 305: 2532–2539. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerstein H, Mann J, Yi Q, et al Albuminuria and risk of CV events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and non‐diabetic individuals. JAMA 2001; 286: 421–446. - PubMed
    1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1296–1295. - PubMed
    1. Andresdottir G, Jensen ML, Carstensen B, et al Improved survival and renal prognosis of patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy with improved control of risk factors. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1660–1667. - PubMed

Publication types