Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 24;9(6):1980.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9061980.

Pre-Pregnancy Obesity, Excessive Gestational Weight Gain, and the Risk of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations

Pre-Pregnancy Obesity, Excessive Gestational Weight Gain, and the Risk of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Małgorzata Lewandowska et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Excessive pre-pregnancy weight is a known risk factor of pregnancy complications. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the relationship between several categories of maternal weight and the risk of developing hypertension and diabetes in pregnancy, and the relationship of these complications with the results of the newborn. It was carried out in a common cohort of pregnant women and taking into account the influence of disturbing factors. Our analysis was conducted in a prospective cohort of 912 Polish pregnant women, recruited during 2015-2016. We evaluated the women who subsequently developed diabetes with dietary modification (GDM-1) (n = 125) and with insulin therapy (GDM-2) (n = 21), as well as the women who developed gestational hypertension (GH) (n = 113) and preeclampsia (PE) (n = 24), compared to the healthy controls. Odds ratios of the complications (and confidence intervals (95%)) were calculated in the multivariate logistic regression. In the cohort, 10.8% of the women had pre-pregnancy obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2), and 36.8% had gestational weight gain (GWG) above the range of the Institute of Medicine recommendation. After correction for excessive GWG and other confounders, pre-pregnancy obesity (vs. normal BMI) was associated with a higher odds ratio of GH (AOR = 4.94; p < 0.001), PE (AOR = 8.61; p < 0.001), GDM-1 (AOR = 2.99; p < 0.001), and GDM-2 (AOR = 11.88; p <0.001). The threshold risk of development of GDM-2 occurred at lower BMI values (26.9 kg/m2), compared to GDM-1 (29.1 kg/m2). The threshold point for GH was 24.3 kg/m2, and for PE 23.1 kg/m2. For GWG above the range (vs. GWG in the range), the adjusted odds ratios of GH, PE, GDM-1, and GDM-2 were AOR = 1.71 (p = 0.045), AOR = 1.14 (p = 0.803), AOR = 0.74 (p = 0.245), and AOR = 0.76 (p = 0.672), respectively. The effect of maternal edema on all the results was negligible. In our cohort, hypertension and diabetes were associated with incorrect birth weight and gestational age at delivery. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance and influence of excessive pre-pregnancy maternal weight on the risk of pregnancy complications such as diabetes and hypertension which can impact fetal outcomes.

Keywords: diabetes; hypertension; obesity; overweight; preeclampsia; pregnancy; risk; weight gain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The risk profiles of hypertension in pregnancy (gestational hypertension (GH) and preeclampsia (PE)) and diabetes in pregnancy (gestational diabetes with dietary modification (GDM-1) and gestational diabetes with insulin therapy (GDM-2)), for pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). The graphs illustrate the changes in the crude risk (OR) of the diseases, estimated on a sliding window (for 30 observations) with respect to the BMI values. The blue points are the odds ratios of the diseases in the adopted window. The curves represent the risk profiles (the curves are smoothed with the Lowess method). The horizontal lines represent OR = 1.00. The light gray points represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals (CI).

References

    1. Neeland I.J., Poirier P., Després J.-P. Cardiovascular and metabolic heterogeneity of obesity: Clinical challenges and implications for management. Circulation. 2018;137:1391–1406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nkoka O., Ntenda P.A.M., Senghore T., Bass P. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of caesarean birth in Malawi. Reprod. Health. 2019;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0700-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinayagam D., Gutierrez J., Binder J., Mantovani E., Thilaganathan B., Khalil A. Impaired maternal hemodynamics in morbidly obese women: A case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;50:761–765. doi: 10.1002/uog.17428. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yao D., Chang Q., Wu Q.-J., Gao S.-Y., Zhao H., Liu Y.-S., Jiang Y.-T., Zhao Y.-H. Relationship between maternal central obesity and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J. Diabetes Res. 2020;2020 doi: 10.1155/2020/6303820. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramonienė G., Maleckienė L., Nadišauskienė R.J., Bartusevičienė E., Railaitė D.R., Mačiulevičienė R., Maleckas A. Maternal obesity and obstetric outcomes in a tertiary referral center. Med. Kaunas Lith. 2017;53:109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2017.03.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources