Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;28(1):67-74.
doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01130-y. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

The clinical usefulness of the CTS5 in the prediction of late distant recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer

Affiliations

The clinical usefulness of the CTS5 in the prediction of late distant recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer

Wakako Tajiri et al. Breast Cancer. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is a promising prognostic tool to evaluate late distant recurrence (DR) risk for breast cancer after 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Patients and methods: Among 560 postmenopausal women with pathological stage I-III estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) primary breast cancer, 383 women who had received 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy without any recurrence at 5 years after surgery were included in this study. The CTS5 was calculated for each patient using a previously published formula, and the patients were stratified by their CTS5 values into the low-, intermediate- and high-CTS5 risk groups.

Results: According to the CTS5, 205 (53.5%), 106 (27.7%) and 72 (18.8%) patients were classified into the low-, intermediate-, and high-CTS5 risk groups, respectively. A higher ER expression level was significantly associated with the low CTS5. The increased administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a high CTS5. The occurrence of DR was higher in the intermediate and high CTS5 groups than in the low CTS5 group. The DRFS in the low CTS5 risk group was significantly better than that in the intermediate- or high-risk groups. In the ER-high or HER2-negative (HER2-) group, the DRFS in the low-risk group was significantly better than that of the intermediate- or high-risk groups. However, in the low-ER or HER2-positive group, there was no significant difference in DRFS among the three risk groups.

Conclusions: In postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer, low CTS5 was considered to be associated with a very low risk of late DR. Thus, extended endocrine therapy may be unnecessary for patients with low CTS5 scores. Extended endocrine therapy should be offered for patients with intermediate or high CTS5 scores, especially those with high-ER and HER2- breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer; CTS5; ER+; Endocrine therapy; Late distant recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of patient selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationships between the CTS5 risk category and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) beyond 5 years after surgery in the total cohort. DRFS in the three CTS5 risk groups. Low, n = 205; intermediate, n = 106; high, n = 72
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The relationships between the CTS5 risk categories and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) beyond 5 years after surgery according to the ER expression and HER2 status. a DRFS in the three CTS5 risk groups in the ER-high group. CTS5 low, n = 149; intermediate, n = 57; high, n = 42. b DRFS in the three CTS5 risk groups in the ER-low group. CTS5 low, n = 44; intermediate, n = 39; high, n = 22. c DRFS in the three CTS5 risk groups in the HER2− group. CTS5 low, n = 168; intermediate, n = 73; high, n = 56. d DRFS in the three CTS5 risk groups in the HER2+ group. CTS5 low, n = 16; intermediate, n = 15; high, n = 9

References

    1. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:438–451. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo K, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T, et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2006: based on data from 15 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:139–147. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr184. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurebayashi J, Miyoshi Y, Ishikawa T, Saji S, Sugie T, Suzuki T, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer and trends in the management of breast cancer patients in Japan: based on the Breast Cancer Registry of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society between 2004 and 2011. Breast Cancer. 2015;22:235–244. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0599-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchida K, Ohashi H, Kinoshita S, Nogi H, Kato K, Toriumi Y, et al. Breast cancer screening and the changing population pyramid of Japan. Breast Cancer. 2015;22:172–176. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0470-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms