Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 29;21(8):62.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00763-7.

Targeting DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Targeting DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Satya Das et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. .

Abstract

Metastatic (and locally advanced) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDA) represents a major challenge for the oncology community given the rising mortality burden from the disease and the preponderance of patients diagnosed with unresectable disease. Although systemic therapies have become more potent with the development of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatments, the median overall survival for patients treated with either of these regimens remains just above 1 year. A significant need exists to build upon the effectiveness of first-line regimens, incorporate tolerable maintenance treatments, and add effective later-line options for patients with this disease. We believe every newly diagnosed mPDA patient should undergo next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, preferably from tumor tissue, to assess for the presence of DNA damage repair (DDR) defects, microsatellite instability, and other possible actionable molecular alterations (such as neurotrophic tropomysin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification). Existing clinical data suggests that patients, whose tumors harbor DDR defects, benefit from treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Preclinically, inhibitors of other critical players in DDR such as ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), and WEE1 have demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in PDA cell lines and xenografts. How to move forward the preclinical promise of these newer DDR-targeting therapies into rational clinical trial combinations and sequence PARP inhibitors in relation to platinum chemotherapy remain areas of tremendous clinical research interest. We believe clinical trials should be considered early for mPDA patients, in all treatment lines, so that novel therapies may be added to the treatment armamentarium for patients with this disease. Beyond NGS testing from tumor tissue, we believe it is important to consider germline genetic testing for all patients diagnosed with PDA given recent data suggesting a much stronger hereditary component of the disease than previously understood, and the potential screening implications for family members.

Keywords: DNA damage repair defects; Homologous recombination defects; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Platinum sensitivity; Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Satya Das and Dana Cardin declare they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Simplified figure illustrating how synthetic lethality is created in cancer cells, with background HR deficits (deleterious mutations in ATM pathway or BRCA), when treated with PARP inhibitors or ATR inhibitors. Crosses imply cells with intrinsic defects in the denoted proteins while –I denotes the target of the specific inhibitors. Abbreviations: MMB, mismatched base; PARP, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase; DSB, double-stranded breaks; HR, homologous recombination; ATM, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; ATR, ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gettinger S, Horn L, Jackman D, Spigel D, Antonia S, Hellmann M, et al. Five-year follow-up of nivolumab in previously treated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: results from the CA209-003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(17):1675–84. - PubMed
    1. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, et al. Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001. Ann Oncol. 2019. 10.1093/annonc/mdz011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ascieto PA, Long GV, Robert C, et al. Survival outcomes in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab therapy: three-year follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;5(2):187–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Motzer R, Escudier B, McDermott D, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1803–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rini B, Plimack E, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1116–27. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances