Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;39(5):1613-1624.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03324-7. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

Double-face preputial island flap revisited: is it a reliable one-stage repair for severe hypospadias?

Affiliations

Double-face preputial island flap revisited: is it a reliable one-stage repair for severe hypospadias?

Thomas Blanc et al. World J Urol. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: We have studied outcome of double-face preputial island flap (DFPIF) technique in severe types of hypospadias: penoscrotal, scrotal and perineal.

Methods: We have used DFPIF in 75 boys at a median age of 1.1 years (1.0-1.5). The meatus was penoscrotal, scrotal or perineal after de-gloving the penis. The inner face of the foreskin was used for urethroplasty and the outer face for ventral skin covering. Modifications were added: proximal anastomosis was protected by a spongioplasty; in case of urethral plate transection, we anastomosed on onlay proximal and distal segments of the flap (onlay-tube-onlay) and the tubularized part was sutured to corpus cavernosa. FU was scheduled at one month then every 3 months for a year then annually. At each consultation, the surgeon filled out a detailed cosmetic and functional sheet including flowmeter.

Results: Thirty-four patients had onlay preputial flap repair with urethral plate preservation. Forty-one had the onlay-tube-onlay technique. All children had a curvature, 19 had a significant residual curvature after dissection, corrected by dorsal plication (n = 9) and ventral lengthening (n = 10). Median FU was 4.2 years (2.7-6.5). 36 children (48%) had complications and needed redo surgery: 12 fistulas, 11 diverticula, 7 meatal stenosis, 3 strictures and 2 residual curvatures. All children but three voided within the normal limits for their age.

Conclusion: DFPIF remains a good option for a one-stage repair of severe hypospadias. After a median of 1.8 procedures, the final success rate was 96%. The healthy well-vascularized ventral skin allows safe redo surgery when needed.

Keywords: Curvature; Double face; Preputial flap; Proximal hypospadias; Single stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A (2010) Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review. J Urol 184(4):1469–1474 - DOI
    1. Long CJ, Canning DA (2016) Hypospadias: are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol 12(4):196.e1–5 - DOI
    1. Elder JS, Duckett JW, Snyder HM (1987) Onlay island flap in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias without chordee. J Urol 138(2):376–379 - DOI
    1. Snodgrass WT (2005) Snodgrass technique for hypospadias repair. BJU Int 95(4):683–693 - DOI
    1. Duckett JW (1981) The island flap technique for hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 8(3):503–511 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources