Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep;32(9):1169-1177.
doi: 10.1002/chir.23258. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

Chiral bioanalytical methods in bioequivalence studies of intravenous vs. oral formulations of ibuprofen

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Chiral bioanalytical methods in bioequivalence studies of intravenous vs. oral formulations of ibuprofen

Esperanza González-Rojano et al. Chirality. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

According to the Ibuprofen Product-Specific Bioequivalence Guidance of the European Medicines Agency, achiral bioanalytical methods are considered acceptable for demonstration of bioequivalence of ibuprofen-containing products. The aim of this investigation is to compare the bioequivalence outcomes obtained with individual R and S ibuprofen enantiomers and the sum of both enantiomers from bioequivalence studies in which new intravenous ibuprofen products were compared with oral ibuprofen products. Bioequivalence was assessed for S and R enantiomers of ibuprofen and the sum of both enantiomers, which was calculated to represent the results that would have been obtained with an achiral assay. The infusion rates of 15, 20, and 30 minutes modify the maximum concentration (Cmax ) of the intravenous administrations. In contrast, the time when the maximum concentration is observed (Tmax ) was insensitive to detect differences in input rate within this range of infusion times. The eutomer S-ibuprofen is the least sensitive analyte to detect differences in input rate; therefore, the regulatory acceptance of achiral bioanalytical methods for ibuprofen bioequivalence studies is justified because the sum of both enantiomers is more discriminative than the chiral methods where only the eutomer is used for regulatory decisions.

Keywords: R-ibuprofen; S-ibuprofen; bioequivalence; enantiomer; intravenous.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams SS, Bresloff P, Mason CG. Pharmacological differences between the optical isomers of ibuprofen: evidence for metabolic inversion of the (-)-isomer. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976;28(3):256-257.
    1. Evans AM. Enantioselective pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of chiral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;42(3):237-256.
    1. Villanueva M, Heckenberger R, Strobach H, Palmer M, Schror K. Equipotent inhibition by R(−)-, S(+)- and racemic ibuprofen of human polymorphonuclear cell function in vitro. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;35(3):235-242.
    1. Evans A, Nation R, Sansom L, Bochner F, Somogyi A. Effect of racemic ibuprofen dose on the magnitude and duration of platelet cyclo-oxygenase inhibition: relationship between inhibition of thromboxane production and the plasma unbound concentration of S(+)- ibuprofen. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;31(2):131-138.
    1. Evans AM. Clinical rheumatology comparative pharmacology of S(+)-ibuprofen and (RS)-ibuprofen. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(1):9-14.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources