Updating facial emotional expressions in working memory: Differentiating trait anxiety and depressiveness
- PMID: 32603911
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103117
Updating facial emotional expressions in working memory: Differentiating trait anxiety and depressiveness
Abstract
Individual differences in updating emotional facial expressions in working memory are not fully understood. Here we focused on the effects of high trait anxiety and high depressiveness in men and women on updating schematic emotional facial expressions (sad, angry, scheming, happy, neutral). A population representative sample of young adults was divided into four emotional disposition groups based on STAI-T and MADRS cut-offs: high anxiety (HA, n = 41), high depressiveness (HD, n = 31), high depressiveness & high anxiety (HAHD, n = 65) and control (CT, n = 155). Participants completed a 2-back task with schematic emotional faces, and valence/arousal ratings and verbal recognition tasks. A novel approach was used to separate encoding from retrieval. We found an interaction of emotional dispositions and emotional faces in updating accuracy. HD group made more errors than HA when encoding happy schematic faces. Other differences between emotional dispositions on updating measures were found but they were not specific to any emotional facial expression. Our findings suggest that there is a minor happy disadvantage in HD in contrast to HA which can be seen in lower accuracy for visual encoding of happy faces, but not in retrieval accuracy, the speed of updating, nor perception of emotional content in happy faces. These findings help to explain differences and similarities between high trait anxiety and high depressiveness in working memory and processing of facial expressions. The results are discussed in relation to prevalent theories of information processing in anxiety and depression.
Keywords: Anxiety and depression; Emotion recognition; Encoding facial expressions; Happy disadvantage; Perceptual bias; Reward devaluation; Signal change detection.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Updating schematic emotional facial expressions in working memory: Response bias and sensitivity.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jan;172:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 9. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017. PMID: 27835749
-
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 26878979
-
Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1231-1243. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00930-8. Mem Cognit. 2019. PMID: 30977105
-
Sad expressions during encoding enhance facial identity recognition in visual working memory in depression: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:630-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 31. J Affect Disord. 2021. PMID: 33190114
-
Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.Neural Plast. 2021 May 27;2021:8851066. doi: 10.1155/2021/8851066. eCollection 2021. Neural Plast. 2021. PMID: 34135956 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Distinct Effects of Anxiety and Depression on Updating Emotional Information in Working Memory.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010544. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36612866 Free PMC article.
-
The Relations of Attention to and Clarity of Feelings With Facial Affect Perception.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 6;13:819902. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819902. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35874362 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical