Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
- PMID: 32604382
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01242
Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
Abstract
Background: Total hip replacement (THR) with a cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) femoral stem has excellent long-term results but is associated with a higher postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) risk compared with composite beam stems. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with PFF revision following THR with PTS stems.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 299,019 primary THRs using PTS stems from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.1 to 8.2 years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PFF revision was estimated for each variable using multivariable Cox survival regression analysis.
Results: Of 299,019 THR cases, 1,055 underwent revision for PFF at a median time of 3.1 years (IQR, 1.0 to 6.1 years). The mean age (and standard deviation) was 72 ± 9.7 years, 64.3% (192,365 patients) were female, and 82.6% (247,126 patients) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2. Variables associated with increased PFF were increasing age (HR, 1.02 per year), intraoperative fracture (HR, 2.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42 to 4.66]), ovaloid (HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.22 to 3.16]) and round cross-sectional shapes (HR, 9.58 [95% CI, 2.29 to 40.12]), increasing stem offset (HR, 1.07 per millimeter), increasing head size (HR, 1.04 per millimeter), THR performed from 2012 to 2016 (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.18 to 1.78]), cobalt-chromium stem material (HR, 6.7 [95% CI, 3.0 to 15.4]), and cobalt-chromium stems with low-viscosity cement (HR, 22.88 [95% CI, 9.90 to 52.85]). Variables associated with a decreased risk of PFF revision were female sex (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.59]), increasing stem length (HR, 0.97 per millimeter), and a ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85]).
Conclusions: Increased risk of PFF revision was associated with PTS stems that are short, have high offset, are used with large femoral heads, are made of cobalt-chromium, or have ovaloid or round cross-sectional shapes. Large increases in PFF risk were associated with cobalt-chromium stems used with low-viscosity cement. Further study is required to confirm causation.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Comment in
-
Back to the Future…Don't Forget the Cement: Commentary on an article by J.N. Lamb, BSc, MBBS, MRCS, et al.: "Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement. A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man".J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):e107. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01026. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020. PMID: 32941244 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data.Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1347-1354. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534. Bone Joint J. 2016. PMID: 27694588
-
Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Is a Leading Cause of Early Revision With Taper-Slip Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 2765 Total Hip Arthroplasties From a High-Volume Hospital.J Arthroplasty. 2021 Nov;36(11):3703-3708.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.022. Epub 2021 Jun 24. J Arthroplasty. 2021. PMID: 34253441
-
How Does Implant Survivorship Vary with Different Corail Femoral Stem Variants? Results of 51,212 Cases with Up to 30 Years Of Follow-up from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2169-2180. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001940. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 34427568 Free PMC article.
-
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Beyond B2.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024 Aug 6;8(8):e23.00135. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00135. eCollection 2024 Aug 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39110721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Post-operative peri-prosthetic fracture rates following the use of cemented polished taper-slip stems for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):4075-4085. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04302-3. Epub 2022 Jan 20. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022. PMID: 35048171
Cited by
-
Does introduction of a cemented polished taper-slip femoral stem reduce early periprosthetic fracture risk with anterior approach total hip arthroplasty? A case-matched study.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 24;145(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05871-3. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40274618
-
The impact of cementing technique in polished taper fit hip stems : a modelling analysis of implant-cement interface.Bone Joint Res. 2025 Jul 16;14(7):642-655. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.147.BJR-2024-0408.R1. Bone Joint Res. 2025. PMID: 40668028 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties Using Short Femoral Stems: Is It Possible?J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Jul;15(7):43-47. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i07.5762. J Orthop Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40635918 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02152-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33407704 Free PMC article.
-
Standard versus short stem cemented Exeter® when used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a survivorship analysis.Arthroplasty. 2023 Sep 3;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00200-8. Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 37660075 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32,644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):461-7.
-
- Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Cherian JJ, Maheshwari AV, Bonutti PM, Mont MA. Incidence and future projections of periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of international registry data. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2015;25(4):269-75.
-
- Gitajn IL, Heng M, Weaver MJ, Casemyr N, May C, Vrahas MS, Harris MB. Mortality following surgical management of Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):9-14.
-
- Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok DM 2nd, Malchau H. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2658-62.
-
- Thien TM, Chatziagorou G, Garellick G, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Mäkelä K, Overgaard S, Pedersen A, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Kärrholm J. Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):e167.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials