Kinematic Sub-Populations in Bull Spermatozoa: A Comparison of Classical and Bayesian Approaches

Abstract

The ejaculate is heterogenous and sperm sub-populations with different kinematic patterns can be identified in various species. Nevertheless, although these sub-populations are statistically well defined, the statistical differences are not always relevant. The aim of the present study was to characterize kinematic sub-populations in sperm from two bovine species, and diluted with different commercial extenders, and to determine the statistical relevance of sub-populations through Bayesian analysis. Semen from 10 bulls was evaluated after thawing. An ISAS^®v1 computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA)-Mot system was employed with an image acquisition rate of 50 Hz and ISAS^®D4C20 counting chambers. Sub-populations of motile spermatozoa were characterized using multivariate procedures such as principal components (PCs) analysis and clustering methods (k-means model). Four different sperm sub-populations were identified from three PCs that involved progressiveness, velocity, and cell undulatory movement. The proportions of the different sperm sub-populations varied with the extender used and in the two species. Despite a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between extenders, the Bayesian analysis confirmed that only one of them (Triladyl^®) presented relevant differences in kinematic patterns when compared with Tris-EY and OptiXcell^®. Extenders differed in the proportion of sperm cells in each of the kinematic sub-populations. Similar patterns were identified in Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Bayesian results indicate that sub-populations SP₁, SP₂, and SP₃ were different for PC criteria and these differences were relevant. For velocity, linearity, and progressiveness, the SP₄ did not show a relevant difference regarding the other sperm sub-populations. The classical approach of clustering or sperm subpopulation thus may not have a direct biological meaning. Therefore, the biological relevance of sperm sub-populations needs to be reevaluated.

Keywords: CASA; bull; cluster; kinematics; motility; spermatozoa.

Figure 1

Distribution of total motility and progressiveness of sperm within sub-populations (SPs) between extenders. Different letters (a–d) indicate differences within SPs between extenders. p < 0.05.