Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 26;10(6):1244.
doi: 10.3390/nano10061244.

Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review

Qingge Wang et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

The propose of this review was to summarize the advances in multi-scale surface technology of titanium implants to accelerate the osseointegration process. The several multi-scaled methods used for improving wettability, roughness, and bioactivity of implant surfaces are reviewed. In addition, macro-scale methods (e.g., 3D printing (3DP) and laser surface texturing (LST)), micro-scale (e.g., grit-blasting, acid-etching, and Sand-blasted, Large-grit, and Acid-etching (SLA)) and nano-scale methods (e.g., plasma-spraying and anodization) are also discussed, and these surfaces are known to have favorable properties in clinical applications. Functionalized coatings with organic and non-organic loadings suggest good prospects for the future of modern biotechnology. Nevertheless, because of high cost and low clinical validation, these partial coatings have not been commercially available so far. A large number of in vitro and in vivo investigations are necessary in order to obtain in-depth exploration about the efficiency of functional implant surfaces. The prospective titanium implants should possess the optimum chemistry, bionic characteristics, and standardized modern topographies to achieve rapid osseointegration.

Keywords: macro-scale; micro-scale; nano-scale; rapid bone integration; roughness; surface modification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of skeleton: descending hierarchical macro- to nano-scale structures of natural bone. (Reproduced with permission from [62]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Schematics of a laser beam melting (LBM) machine; (bd) porous structures; (ef) micro-CT images of human cancellous bones; (g) stacked hollow cubes; (hi) the surgical template in pre-blasting and after blasting condition; (j) the dental restorations; (k) a personalized femoral component. (Reproduced with permission from [93]. Copyright Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) XTT (Dimethoxazole yellow) results of cell viability of MC3T3-E1 fibroblast cells after 24 h in contact with the extracts in the as-received and laser textured surface; (b,c) SEM of the surface of linear geometry and dimple geometry; (df) fluorescent micrographs of the as-received, line geometry and dimple geometry showing the attachment of MC3T3-E1 cells. (Reproduced with permission from [126]. Copyright Elsevier, 2015).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Standard version (grit-blasting); (b) HA coating on standard version; (c) straight Alloclassic™ THA in a 57-year-old female patient for nonunion of a fracture of the femoral neck after removing fixation hardware: immediate postoperative control; (d) radiographic result after 23 years and 3 months of follow-up at the age of 80 years old and 5 months. (Reproduced with permission from [145]. Copyright Elsevier, 2014).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Typical dental implant surface morphology using acid-etching. (Reproduced with permission from [161]. Copyright Elsevier, 2013).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Representative histological images of 3D, 3DA, and SLA implants after implantation for 3 and 6 weeks, respectively (scale bar = 200 μm); (b) quantification of BIC percentages on implant surfaces; (c) SEM of 3D, 3DA, and SLA surfaces; (d) cell morphology on the 3DA surface after culturing of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) for 24 h observed using SEM. (Reproduced with permission from [167]. Copyright Elsevier, 2020).
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Schematics during laser engineered net shaping (LENSTM) and plasma-spraying treatments; (b) bond strength between HA and HA/LENS coatings and substrates; (c) accumulative Ag+ release in MgO-Ag2O-HA/Ti-6Al-4V and MgO-Ag2O-HA/LENS/Ti-6Al-4V group. (Reproduced with permission from [194]. Copyright Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Schematics during anodization; (b) FESEM micrographs showing the morphology of the highly ordered TiO2 nanotubes present on NT-Ca/P; (c) high resolution XPS spectra of deconvoluted Ca 2p; (d) potentiodynamic polarization curves of Ti, NT, NT-Ca/P, and NT-RP-Ca/P samples immersed at 37 °C; (e) FESEM micrographs of MG-63 cells cultured on NT-RP-Ca/P surfaces after one day of incubation. (Reproduced with permission from [198]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guéhennec L.L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Inserm Y.A. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 2006;3:844–854. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao L., Wu S., Liu B., Yang H., Yang L. Advances in metallic biomaterials with both osteogenic and anti-infection properties. ACTA Metall. Sin. 2017;53:1284–1302.
    1. Spriano S., Yamaguchi S., Baino F., Ferraris S. A critical review of multifunctional titanium surfaces: New frontiers for improving osseointegration and host response, avoiding bacteria contamination. Acta Biomater. 2018;79:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brånemark P.-I., Breine U., Adell R., Hansson B.O., Lindström J., Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. Experimental studies. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1969;3:81–100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chrcanovic B.R., Kisch J., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. A retrospective study on clinical and radiological outcomes of oral implants in patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2018;20:199–207. doi: 10.1111/cid.12571. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources