Physiological Predictors of Performance on the CrossFit "Murph" Challenge
- PMID: 32605265
- PMCID: PMC7404702
- DOI: 10.3390/sports8070092
Physiological Predictors of Performance on the CrossFit "Murph" Challenge
Abstract
We examined physiological predictors of performance on the CrossFit Murph challenge (1-mile run, 100 pullups, 200 pushups, 300 air squats, 1-mile run). Male CrossFit athletes (n = 11, 27 ± 3 years) performed a battery of physical assessments including: (1) body composition, (2) upper and lower body strength, (3) upper body endurance, (4) anaerobic power, and (5) maximal oxygen consumption. No less than 72 h later, participants completed the Murph challenge, heart rate was monitored throughout, and blood lactate was obtained pre-post. Correlations between physiological parameters and total Murph time, and Murph subcomponents, were assessed using Pearson's correlations. Murph completion time was 43.43 ± 4.63 min, and maximum and average heart rate values were 185.63 ± 7.64 bpm and 168.81 ± 6.41 bpm, respectively, and post-Murph blood lactate was 10.01 ± 3.04 mmol/L. Body fat percentage was the only physiological parameter significantly related to total Murph time (r = 0.718; p = 0.013). Total lift time (25.49 ± 3.65 min) was more strongly related (r = 0.88) to Murph time than total run time (17.60 ± 1.97 min; r = 0.65). Greater relative anaerobic power (r = -0.634) and less anaerobic fatigue (r = 0.649) were related to total run time (p < 0.05). Individuals wanting to enhance overall Murph performance are advised to focus on minimizing body fat percentage and improving lift performance. Meanwhile, performance on the run subcomponent may be optimized through improvements in anaerobic power.
Keywords: CrossFit; Murph; VO2max; Wingate; body fat; fitness; strength.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Jul 31;6:241-7. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S88265. eCollection 2015. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26261428 Free PMC article.
-
Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit® Performance.Sports (Basel). 2019 Apr 22;7(4):93. doi: 10.3390/sports7040093. Sports (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31013585 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309. Eur J Transl Myol. 2024. PMID: 39221581 Free PMC article.
-
CrossFit®: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit® Performance.Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112. Sports (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37368562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The physical demands and physiological responses to CrossFit®: a scoping review with evidence gap map and meta-correlation.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 20;16(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00986-3. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39300545 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0283910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283910. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38015875 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying CrossFit®: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022. Front Sports Act Living. 2022. PMID: 36311217 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Somatotype and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis of Italian CrossFit® practitioners.Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(8):e29139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29139. eCollection 2024 Apr 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38655297 Free PMC article.
-
Determination of a CrossFit® Benchmark Performance Profile.Sports (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;9(6):80. doi: 10.3390/sports9060080. Sports (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34199523 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jan 19;6:1344036. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1344036. eCollection 2024. Front Sports Act Living. 2024. PMID: 38313217 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lexico Lexico Powered by Oxford. [(accessed on 21 June 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/crossfit.
-
- Crossfit.com. about Affiliation. [(accessed on 12 September 2019)]; Availabe online: https://www.crossfit.com/affiliate.
-
- The Murph Challenge Official Leaderboard. [(accessed on 15 September 2019)];2019 Available online: Themurphchallenge.com.
-
- Chamiri K., Chaouachi A., Racinais S. Exercise Physiology: From a Cellular to an Integrative Approach. IOS Press; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2010. Anaerobic Power and Capacity.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources