Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 28;8(7):92.
doi: 10.3390/sports8070092.

Physiological Predictors of Performance on the CrossFit "Murph" Challenge

Affiliations

Physiological Predictors of Performance on the CrossFit "Murph" Challenge

Ja'Deon D Carreker et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

We examined physiological predictors of performance on the CrossFit Murph challenge (1-mile run, 100 pullups, 200 pushups, 300 air squats, 1-mile run). Male CrossFit athletes (n = 11, 27 ± 3 years) performed a battery of physical assessments including: (1) body composition, (2) upper and lower body strength, (3) upper body endurance, (4) anaerobic power, and (5) maximal oxygen consumption. No less than 72 h later, participants completed the Murph challenge, heart rate was monitored throughout, and blood lactate was obtained pre-post. Correlations between physiological parameters and total Murph time, and Murph subcomponents, were assessed using Pearson's correlations. Murph completion time was 43.43 ± 4.63 min, and maximum and average heart rate values were 185.63 ± 7.64 bpm and 168.81 ± 6.41 bpm, respectively, and post-Murph blood lactate was 10.01 ± 3.04 mmol/L. Body fat percentage was the only physiological parameter significantly related to total Murph time (r = 0.718; p = 0.013). Total lift time (25.49 ± 3.65 min) was more strongly related (r = 0.88) to Murph time than total run time (17.60 ± 1.97 min; r = 0.65). Greater relative anaerobic power (r = -0.634) and less anaerobic fatigue (r = 0.649) were related to total run time (p < 0.05). Individuals wanting to enhance overall Murph performance are advised to focus on minimizing body fat percentage and improving lift performance. Meanwhile, performance on the run subcomponent may be optimized through improvements in anaerobic power.

Keywords: CrossFit; Murph; VO2max; Wingate; body fat; fitness; strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram illustrating participant recruitment efforts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between body fat percentage and total Murph completion time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationships between total Murph completion time and (a) total run time (i.e., run time 1 + run time 2) and (b) total lift time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lexico Lexico Powered by Oxford. [(accessed on 21 June 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/crossfit.
    1. Crossfit.com. about Affiliation. [(accessed on 12 September 2019)]; Availabe online: https://www.crossfit.com/affiliate.
    1. The Murph Challenge Official Leaderboard. [(accessed on 15 September 2019)];2019 Available online: Themurphchallenge.com.
    1. Chamiri K., Chaouachi A., Racinais S. Exercise Physiology: From a Cellular to an Integrative Approach. IOS Press; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2010. Anaerobic Power and Capacity.
    1. Tabata I., Ogita F., Miyachi M. Effects of moderate-intensity endurance and high-intensity intermittent training on anaerobic capacity and VO(2max) Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1996;28:1327–1330. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199610000-00018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources