Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 30;17(1):83.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00715-0.

Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke

Jan Mehrholz  1 , Alex Pollock  2 , Marcus Pohl  3 , Joachim Kugler  4 , Bernhard Elsner  4
Affiliations

Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke

Jan Mehrholz et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to to assess the relative effectiveness of the various types of electromechanical-assisted arm devices and approaches after stroke.

Method: This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with network meta-analysis. Our primary endpoints were activities of daily living (measured e.g. with Barthel-Index) and hand-arm function (measured e.g. with the Fugl-Meyer Scale for the upper limb), our secondary endpoints were hand-arm strength (measured e.g. with the Motricity Index) and safety. We used conventional arm training as our reference category and compared it with different intervention categories of electromechanical-assisted arm training depending on the therapy approach. We did indirect comparisons between the type of robotic device. We considered the heterogeneity of the studies by means of confidence and prediction intervals.

Results: Fifty five randomized controlled trials, including 2654 patients with stroke, met our inclusion criteria. For the primary endpoints activities of daily living and hand-arm function and the secondary endpoint hand-arm strength, none of the interventions achieved statistically significant improvements, taking into account the heterogeneity of the studies. Safety did not differ with regard to the individual interventions of arm rehabilitation after stroke.

Conclusion: The outcomes of robotic-assisted arm training were comparable with conventional therapy. Indirect comparisons suggest that no one type of robotic device is any better or worse than any other device, providing no clear evidence to support the selection of specific types of robotic device to promote hand-arm recovery.

Trial registration: PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017075411.

Keywords: Network meta-analysis; Rehabilitation; Robots; Stroke; Upper limb.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flow Chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
network graph_ADL
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
network graph_Hand_Arm_Function
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
network graph_Arm strength
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
network graph_AEs
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest Plot ADL
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest Plot Hand_Arm_Function
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest Plot AEs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, Dichgans M, Cordonnier C, Guekht A, et al. Action plan for stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3(4):309–336. doi: 10.1177/2396987318808719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollock A, Farmer S, Brady M, Langhorne P, Mead G, Mehrholz J, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Stroke. 2015;46(3):e57–e58. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008295. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B. Electromechanical and robot-assisted armtraining for improving activities of dailyliving, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD006876. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EEH, Meskers CGM, Kwakkel G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(2):107–121. doi: 10.1177/1545968316666957. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C. Roboter- und gerätegestützte rehabilitation nach Schlaganfall: Gehen und arm−/Handfunktion. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2008;105(18):330–336. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types