Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;8(3):338-349.
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 27.

Real-World Assessment of the Impact of Erectile Dysfunction on Sexual Planning Behavior and Health- and Treatment-Related Outcomes Among Men in 8 Countries

Affiliations

Real-World Assessment of the Impact of Erectile Dysfunction on Sexual Planning Behavior and Health- and Treatment-Related Outcomes Among Men in 8 Countries

Irwin Goldstein et al. Sex Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: The effect of erectile dysfunction (ED) on sexual planning behaviors and outcomes in men taking phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) is not well studied.

Aims: To assess sexual habits, behaviors, and treatment-related outcomes of PDE5I-treated men with ED.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study recruited men aged 30 to 70 years with mild-to-severe ED from 8 diverse countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Russia, Turkey, Israel, China, and Japan) to complete an approximately 15-minute survey. Differences were evaluated using bivariate analyses, and data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Main outcome measures: Self-reported data were collected for demographics, health characteristics, treatment, sexual habits, ED severity, ED-specific quality of life, and treatment satisfaction.

Results: The survey was completed by 1,575 men. Mean frequency of sexual intercourse was 5.7 times/month. Overall, 87.1% of men always, often, or sometimes planned for sexual activity. Of those planning in advance, 32.8% and 40.6% agreed or strongly agreed that they plan for specific days of the week and times of day, respectively. Sexual planning habits were similar for patients taking short-acting vs long-acting PDE5Is. The most commonly cited reasons for planning sexual activity were needing time to take medication (48.4%), needing to make sure medication has taken effect (43.4%), convenient time for sexual activity (34.9%), and needing the partner's agreement (33.4%). Mean Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire total score was 56.4.

Conclusions: The differences in ED burden and sexual planning behavior observed across countries were not influenced by the type of PDE5I being taken, suggesting that cultural differences are an important factor when considering types of ED treatment. These findings provide a better understanding of burden, sexual habits, planning behaviors, quality of life, and treatment-related outcomes among PDE5I-treated men with ED in 8 Western and non-Western countries and may aid healthcare providers in selecting optimal treatments. Goldstein I, Giraldi A, Maculaitis MC, Real-World Assessment of the Impact of Erectile Dysfunction on Sexual Planning Behavior and Health- and Treatment-Related Outcomes Among Men in 8 Countries. J Sex Med 2020;8:338-349.

Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; Global Male Sexual Habits Survey; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Quality of Life; Sexual Activity Planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of planning for sexual intercourse (A) by country and (B) by short-acting vs long-acting PDE5I. Totals may not sum to 100% due to rounding. PDE5I = phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Advance planning for sexual intercourse (A) by country and (B) by short-acting vs long-acting PDE5I. Totals may not sum to 100% due to rounding. PDE5I = phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Erectile dysfunction severity assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (A) without medication and (B) with medication, in the past 4 weeks. Erection Hardness Score: 0 = penis does not enlarge; 1 = penis is larger, but not hard; 2 = penis is hard, but not hard enough for penetration; 3 = penis is hard enough for penetration, but not completely hard; 4 = penis is completely hard and fully rigid. Totals may not sum to 100% due to rounding.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Outcomes assessed using (A) Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire total and domain scores and (B) satisfaction with sexual intercourse frequency. Totals may not sum to 100% due to rounding. SEAR = Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lue T.F., Giuliano F., Montorsi F. Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men. J Sex Med. 2004;1:6–23. - PubMed
    1. Sand M.S., Fisher W., Rosen R. Erectile dysfunction and constructs of masculinity and quality of life in the multinational Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study. J Sex Med. 2008;5:583–594. - PubMed
    1. McCabe M.P., Sharlip I.D., Lewis R. Incidence and prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J Sex Med. 2016;13:144–152. - PubMed
    1. Rosen R.C., Fisher W.A., Eardley I. The multinational Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study: I. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:607–617. - PubMed
    1. McCabe M.P., Sharlip I.D., Lewis R. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction among women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J Sex Med. 2016;13:153–167. - PubMed