Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 30;10(6):e036982.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036982.

Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department

Affiliations

Study protocol for the ACT response pilot intervention: development, implementation and evaluation of a systems-based Agitation Code Team (ACT) in the emergency department

Ambrose H Wong et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) visits for behavioural conditions are rising, with 1.7 million associated episodes of patient agitation occurring annually in acute care settings. When de-escalation techniques fail during agitation management, patients are subject to use of physical restraints and sedatives, which are associated with up to 37% risk of hypotension, apnoea and physical injuries. At the same time, ED staff report workplace violence due to physical assaults during agitation events. We recently developed a theoretical framework to characterise ED agitation, which identified teamwork as a critical component to reduce harm. Currently, no structured team response protocol for ED agitation addressing both patient and staff safety exists.

Methods and analysis: Our proposed study aims to develop and implement the agitation code team (ACT) response intervention, which will consist of a standardised, structured process with defined health worker roles/responsibilities, work processes and clinical protocols. First, we will develop the ACT response intervention in a two-step design loop; conceptual design will engage users in the creation of the prototype, and iterative refinement will occur through in situ simulated agitated patient encounters in the ED to assess and improve the design. Next, we will pilot the intervention in the clinical environment and use a controlled interrupted time series design to evaluate its effect on our primary outcome of patient restraint use. The intervention will be considered efficacious if we effectively lower the rate of restraint use over a 6-month period.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval by the Yale University Human Investigation Committee was obtained in 2019 (HIC #2000025113). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific meetings for each phase of the study. If this pilot is successful, we plan to formally integrate the ACT response intervention into clinical workflows at all EDs within our entire health system.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; mental health; occupational & industrial medicine; psychiatry; quality in health care; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview and steps for each phase of ACT response intervention study. ED, emergency department.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Iterative two-step user-centred design process for development of ACT response prototype.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Controlled interrupted time series design. ACT, Agitation Code Team.

References

    1. Capp R, Hardy R, Lindrooth R, et al. . National trends in emergency department visits by adults with mental health disorders. J Emerg Med 2016;51:131–5. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nordstrom K, Zun LS, Wilson MP, et al. . Medical evaluation and triage of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the American association for emergency psychiatry project beta medical evaluation workgroup. West J Emerg Med 2012;13:3–10. 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holloman GH, Zeller SL. Overview of project beta: best practices in evaluation and treatment of agitation. West J Emerg Med 2012;13:1–2. 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6865 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohr WK, Petti TA, Mohr BD. Adverse effects associated with physical restraint. Can J Psychiatry 2003;48:330–7. 10.1177/070674370304800509 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zun LS. A prospective study of the complication rate of use of patient restraint in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2003;24:119–24. 10.1016/S0736-4679(02)00738-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources