Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 12:13:495-506.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S246184. eCollection 2020.

Development of a Short Form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC)

Tuva Sandsdalen  1 , Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl  2 , Bodil Wilde-Larsson  1   3
Affiliations

Development of a Short Form of the Questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC)

Tuva Sandsdalen et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patients' views on quality are important to improve person-centered palliative care. There is a lack of short, validated instruments incorporating patients' perspectives of the multidisciplinary palliative care services. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of the instrument Quality from the Patient's Perspective for Palliative Care (QPP-PC) and to describe and compare patients' perceptions of the subjective importance (SI) of care aspects and their perceptions of care received (PR).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Norway including 128 patients (67% response rate) in four palliative care contexts. The QPP-PC, based on a person-centered theoretical framework, incorporating the multidisciplinary palliative care, comprises 4 dimensions; medical-technical competence, physical-technical conditions, identity-oriented approach and sociocultural atmosphere, 12 factors (49 items) and 3 single items. The instrument measures SI and PR. Development of the short form of the QPP-PC was inspired by previously published methodological guidelines. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach's α were used.

Results: The short form of QPP-PC consists of 4 dimensions, 20 items and 4 single items. Psychometric evaluation showed a root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) value of 0.109 (SI). Cronbach's α values ranged between 0.64 and 0.85 for most dimensions on SI scales. Scores on SI and PR scales were mostly high. Significantly higher scores for SI than PR were present for the identity-oriented approach dimension, especially on items about information.

Conclusion: RMSEA value was slightly above the recommended level. Cronbach's α was acceptable for most dimensions. The short form of QPP-PC shows promising results and may be used with caution as an indicator of person-centered patient-reported experience measures evaluating the multidisciplinary palliative care for patients in a late palliative phase. However, the short version of QPP-PC needs to be further validated using new samples of patients.

Keywords: palliative care; patient reported experience measures; person-centered care; quality of healthcare; quality from the patients' perspective specific for palliative care; QPP-PC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The data used were collected with financial support from Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences and partly from Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). The Solid Facts. Palliative Care. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2004.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Palliative Care for Older People: Better Practice. Copenhagen: World Health Organization (WHO); 2011.
    1. Lawrence RJ. Urban health challenges in Europe. J Urban Health. 2013;90(S1):23–36. doi:10.1007/s11524-012-9761-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McIlfatrick S. Assessing palliative care needs: views of patients, informal carers and healthcare professionals. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(1):77–86. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04062.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray SA, Boyd K, Kendall M, Worth A, Benton TF, Clausen H. Dying of lung cancer or cardiac failure: prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers in the community. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):929–932. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7370.929 - DOI - PMC - PubMed