Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 26;8(12):2408-2424.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2408.

Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives

Alain Boussuges et al. World J Clin Cases. .

Abstract

This article reports the various methods used to assess diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography. The excursions of the two hemidiaphragms can be measured using two-dimensional or M-mode ultrasonography, during respiratory maneuvers such as quiet breathing, voluntary sniffing and deep inspiration. On the zone of apposition to the rib cage for both hemidiaphragms, it is possible to measure the thickness on expiration and during deep breathing to assess the percentage of thickening during inspiration. These two approaches make it possible to assess the quality of the diaphragmatic function and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis or dysfunction. These methods are particularly useful in circumstances where there is a high risk of phrenic nerve injury or in diseases affecting the contractility or the motion of the diaphragm such as neuro-muscular diseases. Recent methods such as speckle tracking imaging and ultrasound shear wave elastography should provide more detailed information for better assessment of diaphragmatic function.

Keywords: Dysfunction; Hemidiaphragm; M-mode; Motion; Paralysis; Speckle tracking imaging; Thickness; Two-dimensional mode; Ultrasound; Ultrasound shear wave elastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diaphragmatic motion recorded by M-mode ultrasonography: measurement of diaphragm excursion, inspiratory time and velocity of contraction. Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second. d: Diaphragm excursion; t: Inspiratory time; v: Velocity of contraction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Use of angle-independent M-mode sonography (arrow) to obtain a perpendicular approach of the right hemidiaphragm: Measurement of excursion (7.14 cm) during deep breathing. Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diaphragmatic motion recorded by M-mode ultrasonography during voluntary sniffing (excursion = 4.51 cm). Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Measurement of diaphragm thickness using B-mode ultrasonography: The diaphragm thickening is calculated from the measurement of thickness at both end expiration and end inspiration [here = (4.4-2.6)/2.6 = 69%]. Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Recording of the changes in diaphragm thickness during quiet breathing using M-mode tracing (measurement of thickness at end expiration (1 L = 0.25 cm), at end inspiration (2 L = 0.34 cm). Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Paradoxical motion (-1.26 cm) recorded by M-mode ultrasonography in patient with left hemidiaphragm paralysis. Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Motion recorded during deep breathing in patient suffering from right hemidiaphragm paralysis: Paradoxical motion at the beginning of inspiration (-0.41 cm) terminal excursion in the cranio-caudal direction (+1.5 cm). Ordinate in centimeter, abscissa in second.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harris RS, Giovannetti M, Kim BK. Normal ventilatory movement of the right hemidiaphragm studied by ultrasonography and pneumotachography. Radiology. 1983;146:141–144. - PubMed
    1. Houston JG, Morris AD, Howie CA, Reid JL, McMillan N. Technical report: quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement--a reproducible method using ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 1992;46:405–407. - PubMed
    1. Targhetta R, Chavagneux R, Ayoub J, Lemerre C, Préfaut C, Bourgeois JM, Balmes P. [Right diaphragmatic kinetics measured by TM-mode ultrasonography with concomitant spirometry in normal subjects and asthmatic patients. Preliminary results] Rev Med Interne. 1995;16:819–826. - PubMed
    1. Kantarci F, Mihmanli I, Demirel MK, Harmanci K, Akman C, Aydogan F, Mihmanli A, Uysal O. Normal diaphragmatic motion and the effects of body composition: determination with M-mode sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:255–260. - PubMed
    1. Ueki J, De Bruin PF, Pride NB. In vivo assessment of diaphragm contraction by ultrasound in normal subjects. Thorax. 1995;50:1157–1161. - PMC - PubMed