Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;29(2):1111-1119.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05595-7. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Communication in surgical decision-making while managing metastatic bone disease: matching patient expectations with surgical goals

Kristen I Barton  1 , Olesja Hazenbiller  2 , Georgina Freeman  3 , Kayla Kashluba  2 , Melvin Ball  4 , Abir Aboutaha  4 , Shannon K T Puloski  1   2   5 , Michael J Monument  6   7   8
Affiliations

Communication in surgical decision-making while managing metastatic bone disease: matching patient expectations with surgical goals

Kristen I Barton et al. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of research examining how surgical decision-making for metastatic bone disease (MBD) can be optimized to improve quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes, while accurately aligning with patient goals and expectations. The objective of this study was to survey and interview patients with MBD and support persons (PS), physicians, and allied health care providers (HCP) with the goal of identifying (1) important surgical issues related to MBD management, (2) discordance in perioperative expectations, and (3) perceived measures of success in the surgical management of MBD.

Methods: Utilizing a custom survey developed by HCP and patients with MBD, participants were asked to (1) identify important issues related to MBD management, (2) rank perceived measures of success, and (3) answer open-ended questions pertaining to the management of MBD.

Results: From the survey, increased life expectancy, minimizing disease progression, removal of local tumour, timely surgery after diagnosis, increased length of hospitalization, and physiotherapy access were all identified as significant discordant goals between PS and physicians/HCP. Conversely, there was an agreement between physicians and HCP who considered improved QOL and functional outcomes as most important goals. Structured homogenous-group workshops identified the need for (1) improved discussions of prognosis, surgical options, expectations, timelines, and resources, (2) the use of a care team "quarterback", and (3) an increased use of multi-disciplinary treatment planning.

Conclusions: We feel this data highlights the importance of improved communication and coordination in treating patients with MBD. Further research evaluating how surgical techniques influence survival and disease progression in MBD is highly relevant and important to patients.

Keywords: Decision-making; Expectations; Health-related quality of life; Metastatic bone disease; Surgical management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schulman KL, Kohles J (2007) Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S. Cancer 109(11):2334–2342 - DOI
    1. Kelly M, Lee M, Clarkson P, O’Brien P (2012) Metastatic disease of the long bones: a review of the health care burden in a major trauma centre. Can J Surg 55(2):95–98 - DOI
    1. Agarwal MG, Nayak P (2015) Management of skeletal metastases: an orthopaedic surgeon's guide. Indian J Orthop 49(1):83–100 - DOI
    1. Quinn RH, Randall RL, Benevenia J, Berven SH, Raskin KA (2014) Contemporary management of metastatic bone disease: tips and tools of the trade for general practitioners. Instr Course Lect 63:431–441 - PubMed
    1. Tharmalingam S et al (2008) Quality of life measurement in bone metastases: a literature review. J Pain Res 1:49–58 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources