Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;190(1):67-77.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02286-4. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Validity of a dysphagia screening test following resection for head and neck cancer

Affiliations

Validity of a dysphagia screening test following resection for head and neck cancer

Nobuhide Horii et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of a dysphagia screening test (DST) in patients who have undergone resection for head and neck cancer (HNC). In addition, we examined whether or not combined effects of DSTs improve the detection accuracy of penetration/aspiration.

Methods: Thirty-six HNC patients were participated. The DST consisted of the repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), the water swallowing test (WST), the modified water swallowing test (MWST), the food test (FT), and tongue pressure. A videofluoroscopic swallowing study was conducted, and the penetration-aspiration scale was used for scoring. For statistical analyses, we used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Furthermore, the accuracy of the determination of penetration/aspiration was evaluated by combining two or three DSTs.

Results: The penetration/aspiration could be predicted with moderate accuracy based on MWST and FT. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the MWST and FT were 0.76 (p = 0.03) and 0.80 (p = 0.050), and the sensitivity/specificity was 0.9/0.61 (MWST) and 0.8/0.8 (FT), respectively. As a result of combining 2 or 3 DSTs, the combination of "MWST and FT" was the most accurate, with an AUC of 0.87 (p = 0.02). The combination of three tests had lower accuracy than the combination of two tests.

Conclusion: Based on our results, it is recommended that MWST or FT be used when only one type of DST is performed. In addition, the combination of two DSTs may detect aspiration patients more accurately than one alone.

Keywords: Deglutition; Dysphagia; Head and neck cancer; Screening test; Videofluoroscopic swallowing study.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Logemann JA, Bytell DE (1979) Swallowing disorders in three types of head and neck surgical patients. Cancer 44:1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197909)44:3<1095::aid-cncr282044034... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hey C, Lange BP, Eberle S, Zaretsky Y, Sader R, Stöver T, Wagenblast J (2013) Water swallow screening test for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer: early identification of dysphagia, aspiration and limitations of oral intake. Anticancer Res 33:4017–4021 - PubMed
    1. Borggreven PA, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, Rinkel RN et al (2007) Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction. Head Neck 29:638–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20582 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin BM, Starmer HM, Gourin CG (2012) The relationship between depressive symptoms, quality of life, and swallowing function in head and neck cancer patients 1 year after definitive therapy. Laryngoscope 122:1518–1525. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23312 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Payakachat N, Ounpraseuth S, Suen JY (2013) Late complications and long-term quality of life for survivors (> 5 years) with history of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 35:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23035 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources