Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD001835.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub5.

Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms

Affiliations

Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms

Pinar Ulug et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an abnormal ballooning of the major abdominal artery. Some AAAs present as emergencies and require surgery; others remain asymptomatic. Treatment of asymptomatic AAAs depends on many factors, but the size of the aneurysm is important, as risk of rupture increases with aneurysm size. Large asymptomatic AAAs (greater than 5.5 cm in diameter) are usually repaired surgically; very small AAAs (less than 4.0 cm diameter) are monitored with ultrasonography. Debate continues over the roles of early repair versus surveillance with repair on subsequent enlargement in people with asymptomatic AAAs of 4.0 cm to 5.5 cm diameter. This is the fourth update of the review first published in 1999.

Objectives: To compare mortality and costs, as well as quality of life and aneurysm rupture as secondary outcomes, following early surgical repair versus routine ultrasound surveillance in people with asymptomatic AAAs between 4.0 cm and 5.5 cm in diameter.

Search methods: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, two other databases, and two trials registers to 10 July 2019. We handsearched conference proceedings and checked reference lists of relevant studies.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials where people with asymptomatic AAAs of 4.0 cm to 5.5 cm were randomly allocated to early repair or imaging-based surveillance at least every six months. Outcomes had to include mortality or survival.

Data collection and analysis: Three review authors independently extracted data, which were cross-checked by other team members. Outcomes were mortality, costs, quality of life, and aneurysm rupture. For mortality, we estimated risk ratios (RR) (endovascular aneurysm repair only), hazard ratios (HR) (open repair only), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on Mantel-Haenszel Chi2 statistics at one and six years (open repair only) following randomisation.

Main results: We found no new studies for this update. Four trials with 3314 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two trials compared early open repair with surveillance and two trials compared early endovascular repair (EVAR) with surveillance. We used GRADE to access the certainty of the evidence for mortality and cost, which ranged from high to low. We downgraded the certainty in the evidence from high to moderate and low due to risk of bias concerns and imprecision (some outcomes were only reported by one study). All four trials showed an early survival benefit in the surveillance group (due to 30-day operative mortality with repair) but no evidence of differences in long-term survival. One study compared early open repair with surveillance with an adjusted HR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.02, mean follow-up 10 years; HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54, mean follow-up 4.9 years). Pooled analysis of participant-level data from the two trials comparing early open repair with surveillance (maximum follow-up seven to eight years) showed no evidence of a difference in survival (propensity score-adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.18; 2226 participants; high-certainty evidence). This lack of treatment effect did not vary to three years by AAA diameter (P = 0.39), participant age (P = 0.61), or for women (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.11). Two studies compared EVAR with surveillance and there was no evidence of a survival benefit for early EVAR at 12 months (RR 1.92, 95% CI 0.73 to 5.06; 846 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported costs. The mean UK health service costs per participant over the first 18 months after randomisation were higher in the open repair surgery than the surveillance group (GBP 4978 in the repair group versus GBP 3914 in the surveillance group; mean difference (MD) GBP 1064, 95% CI 796 to 1332; 1090 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was a similar difference after 12 years. The mean USA hospital costs for participants at six months after randomisation were higher in the EVAR group than in the surveillance group (USD 33,471 with repair versus USD 5520 with surveillance; MD USD 27,951, 95% CI 25,156 to 30,746; 614 participants; low-certainty evidence). After four years, there was no evidence of a difference in total medical costs between groups (USD 48,669 with repair versus USD 46,112 with surveillance; MD USD 2557, 95% CI -8043 to 13,156; 614 participants; low-certainty evidence). All studies reported quality of life but used different assessment measurements and results were conflicting. All four studies reported aneurysm rupture. There were very few ruptures reported in the trials of EVAR versus surveillance up to three years. In the trials of open surgery versus surveillance, there were ruptures to at least six years and there were more ruptures in the surveillance group, but most of these ruptures occurred in aneurysms that had exceeded the threshold for surgical repair.

Authors' conclusions: There was no evidence of an advantage to early repair for small AAA (4.0 cm to 5.5 cm), regardless of whether open repair or EVAR is used and, at least for open repair, regardless of patient age and AAA diameter. Thus, neither early open nor early EVAR of small AAAs is supported by currently available evidence. Long-term data from the two trials investigating EVAR are not available, so, we can only draw firm conclusions regarding outcomes after the first few years for open repair. Research regarding the risks related to and management of small AAAs in ethnic minorities and women is urgently needed, as data regarding these populations are lacking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PU: none.

JTP: was a co‐principal investigator in the UKSAT study and as such has declared that her institution received grants from British Heart Foundation (Chief Investigator) and the Medical Research Council (co‐applicant). As recommended, steps were taken to ensure no involvement in data extraction for the UKSAT trial. JTP also declares that her institution has received grants/support from National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) for involvement in studies on endovascular repair in aneurysm rupture, angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to slow AAA growth; and NIHR HTA support for individual patient meta‐analysis of small AAA growth rates and screening women for AAA (a modelling study).

MAMM: none.

DJB: was a co‐investigator of the ADAM trial and appropriate steps were taken to ensure no involvement in data extraction for this study.

GF: declared that pooled analysis reported in this review (Filardo 2013) was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), grant number R01HS018576.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for the outcomes of mortality and cost presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Early repair compared to ultrasound surveillance for small asymptomatic AAA, Outcome 1: Health service costs

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

ADAM {published data only}
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Effect of age on survival between open repair and surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. American Journal of Cardiology 2014;114(8):1281-6. - PubMed
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Immediate open repair vs surveillance in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: survival differences by aneurysm size. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2013;88(9):910-9. - PubMed
    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Littooy FN, et al. Quality of life, impotence, and activity level in a randomized trial of immediate repair versus surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003;38(4):745-52. - PubMed
    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, et al, Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. The aneurysm detection and management study screening programme: validation cohort and final results. Archives of Internal Medicine 2000;160(10):1425-30. - PubMed
    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, et al, Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997;126(6):441-9. - PubMed
CAESAR {published data only}
    1. Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Romano L, Cieri E, for the CAESAR Trial Group. Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2011;41(1):13-25. - PubMed
    1. Cao P, CAESAR Trial Collaborators. Comparison of Surveillance vs Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) trial: study design and progress. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005;30(3):245-51. - PubMed
    1. De Rango P, Verzini F, Parlani G, Cieri E, Romano L, Loschi D, et al. Quality of life in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm: the effect of early endovascular repair versus surveillance in the CAESAR trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2011;41(3):324-31. - PubMed
    1. NCT00118573. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair. clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00118573 (accessed 14 November 2011).
PIVOTAL {published data only}
    1. Eisenstein EL, Davidson-Ray L, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Ouriel K. Economic analysis of endovascular repair versus surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013;58(2):302-10. - PubMed
    1. NCT00444821. The (PIVOTAL) study. clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00444821 (accessed 8 April 2014).
    1. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent CK, Zarins CK, PIVOTAL investigators. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009;50(2):449. - PubMed
    1. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, Zarins CK, for the Positive Impact of Endovascular Options for treating Aneurysms Early (PIVOTAL) Investigators. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2010;51(5):1081-7. - PubMed
    1. Ouriel K. The PIVOTAL study: a randomized comparison of endovascular repair versus surveillance in patients with smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009;49(1):266-9. - PubMed
UKSAT {published data only}
    1. Brown LC, Thompson SG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT, UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Fit patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) do not benefit from early intervention. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2008;48(6):1375-81. - PubMed
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Effect of age on survival between open repair and surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. American Journal of Cardiology 2014;1148(8):1281-6. - PubMed
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Immediate open repair vs surveillance in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: survival differences by aneurysm size. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2013;88(9):910-19. - PubMed
    1. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. British Journal of Surgery 2007;94(6):702-8. - PubMed
    1. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Health service costs and quality of life for early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet 1998;352(9141):1656-60. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Canadian trial [pers comm] {unpublished data only}
    1. Cole CW. [personal communication]. Conversation with review authors Dr Ballard and Prof Powell 1998.

Additional references

Abedi 2009
    1. Abedi NN, Davenport DL, Xenos E, Sorial E, Minion DJ, Endean ED. Gender and 30-day outcome in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): an analysis using the ACS NSQIP dataset. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009;50(3):486-91. - PubMed
Ballard 1992
    1. Ballard DJ, Etchason JA, Hilborne LH, Campion ME, Kamberg CJ, Solomon DH, et al. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery. A Literature Review and Ratings of Appropriateness and Necessity. Santa Monica (CA): RAND, 1992. [file://icnas3.cc.ic.ac.uk/pulug/downloads/JRA04.pdf]
Ballard 2012
    1. Ballard DJ, Filardo G, da Graca B, Powell JT. Clinical practice change requires more than comparative effectiveness evidence: abdominal aortic aneurysm management in the USA. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2012;1(1):31-44. - PubMed
Becquemin 2011
    1. Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, Sapoval M, Goueffic Y, Lermusiaux P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2011;53(5):1167-73. - PubMed
Bown 2002
    1. Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, Sayers RD. A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery 2002;89(6):714-30. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Bown 2013
    1. Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2013;309(8):806-13. - PubMed
Brown 2003
    1. Brown PM, Zelt DT, Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003;37(2):280-4. - PubMed
Chaikof 2018
    1. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2018;67(1):2-77. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Cosford 2007
    1. Cosford PA, Leng GC, Thomas J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002945.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
De Bruin 2010
    1. De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Cuypers PW, et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362(20):1881-9. - PubMed
Eisenstein 2013
    1. Eisenstein EL, Davidson-Ray L, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Ouriel K. Economic analysis of endovascular repair versus surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013;58(2):302-10. - PubMed
EVAR Trial Participants 2005
    1. EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365(9478):2179-86. - PubMed
Filardo 2013
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Immediate open repair vs surveillance in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: survival differences by aneurysm size. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2013;88(9):910-19. - PubMed
Filardo 2014
    1. Filardo G, Lederle FA, Ballard DJ, Hamilton C, da Graca B, Herrin J, et al. Effect of age on survival between open repair and surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. American Journal of Cardiology 2014;114(8):1281-6. - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime) GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), (accessed prior to 7 June 2020).Available at gradepro.org.
Grøndal 2015
    1. Grøndal N, Søgaard R, Lindholt JS. Baseline prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease and hypertension in men aged 65-74 years from a population screening study (VIVA trial). British Journal of Surgery 2015;102(8):902-6. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Jacomelli 2016
    1. Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, Lees T, Earnshaw JJ. Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme. British Journal of Surgery 2016;103(9):1125-31. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kent 2004
    1. Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Jaff MR, Hollenbeck ST, Thompson RW, Schermerhorn ML, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a consensus statement. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004;39(1):267-9. - PubMed
Kent 2014
    1. Kent KC. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;371(22):2101-8. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Kontopodis 2020
    1. Kontopodis N, Galanakis N, Antoniou SA, Tsetis D, Ioannou CV, Veith FJ, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of outcomes of endovascular and open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2020;59(3):399-410. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lederle 1988
    1. Lederle FA, Walker JM, Reinke DB. Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound. Archives of Internal Medicine 1988;148(8):1753-6. [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lederle 1997
    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, et al, Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997;126(6):441-9. - PubMed
Lederle 2000
    1. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Hye RJ, Makaroun MS, et al, Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Archives of Internal Medicine 2000;160(10):1425-30. - PubMed
Lederle 2009
    1. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009;302(14):1535-42. - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Lindholt 1999
    1. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 1999;17(6):472-5. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Lo 2013
    1. Lo RC, Bensley RP, Hamdan AD, Wyers M, Adams JE, Schermerhorn ML. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm presentation, repair, and mortality in the Vascular Study Group of New England. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013;57(5):1261-8. - PMC - PubMed
McPhee 2007
    1. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Eslami MH. The impact of gender on presentation, therapy, and mortality of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001-2004. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2007;45(5):891-9. - PubMed
Mehta 2012
    1. Mehta M, Byrne WJ, Robinson H, Roddy SP, Paty PS, Kreienberg PB, et al. Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012;55(4):906-13. - PubMed
Myers 2010
    1. Myers JN, White JJ, Narasimhan B, Dalman RL. Effects of exercise training in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: preliminary results from a randomized trial. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2010;30(6):374-83. - PubMed
NICE 2020
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Guideline. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: diagnosis and management (NG156), 2020. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng156 (accessed 6 May 2020).
Oliver‐Williams 2019
    1. Oliver-Williams C, Sweeting MJ, Jacomelli J, Summers L, Stevenson A, Lees T, et al. Safety of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms under surveillance in the NAAASP. Circulation 2019;139(11):1371-80. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Page 2019
    1. Page MJ, Higgins JP, Sterne JA. Chapter 13: Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Patel 2016
    1. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM, EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;388(10058):2366-74. [DOI: ] [PMID: 27743617 ] - PubMed
Powell 2008
    1. Powell JT, Brown LC, Greenhalgh RM, Thompson SG. The rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms: Is this modified by anatomical suitability for endovascular repair? Annals of Surgery 2008;247(1):173-9. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Powell 2017
    1. Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Ulug P, Blankensteijn JD, Lederle FA, Becquemin JP, et al. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. British Journal of Surgery 2017;104(3):166-78. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Prinssen 2004
    1. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, Sambeek MR, Balm R. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(16):1607-18. - PubMed
RESCAN Collaborators 2013
    1. RESCAN Collaborators, Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2013;309(8):806-13. - PubMed
Rogers 2013
    1. Rogers IS, Massaro JM, Truong QA, Mahabadi AA, Kriegel MF, Fox CS, et al. Distribution, determinants, and normal reference values of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters by computed tomography (from the Framingham Heart Study). American Journal of Cardiology 2013;111(10):1510-6. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Rudarakanchana 2013
    1. Rudarakanchana N, Powell JT. Advances in imaging and surveillance of AAA: when, how, how often? Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 2013;56(1):7-12. - PubMed
Sakalihasan 2018
    1. Sakalihasan N, Michel JB, Katsargyris A, Kuivaniemi H, Defraigne JO, Nchimi A, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nature reviews. Disease Primers 2018;4(1):34. [DOI: ] [PMID: 30337540 ] - PubMed
Sampson 2014
    1. Sampson UK, Norman PE, Fowkes FG, Aboyans V, Song Y, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Global and regional burden of aortic dissection and aneurysms: mortality trends in 21 world regions, 1990 to 2010. Global Heart 2014;9(1):171-80. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Sidloff 2014
    1. Sidloff D, Stather P, Dattani N, Bown M, Thompson J, Sayers R, et al. Aneurysm global epidemiology study: public health measures can further reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality. Circulation 2014;129(7):747-53. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Stackelberg 2014
    1. Stackelberg O, Björck M, Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Sex differences in the association between smoking and abdominal aortic aneurysm. British Journal of Surgery 2014;101(10):1230-7. [DOI: ] [PMID: 24916023 ] - PubMed
Svensjö 2011
    1. Svensjö S, Björck M, Gürtelschmid M, Djavani Gidlund K, Hellberg A, Wanhainen A. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation 2011;124(10):1118-23. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Sweeting 2012
    1. Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Powell JT, RESCAN collaborators. Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. British Journal of Surgery 2012;99(5):655-65. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Tew 2012
    1. Tew GA, Moss J, Crank H, Mitchell PA, Nawaz S. Endurance exercise training in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized controlled pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012;93(12):2148-53. - PubMed
Ulug 2016
    1. Ulug P, Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Bown MJ, Thompson SG, SWAN Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. British Journal of Surgery 2016;103(9):1097-104. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PMC - PubMed
Ulug 2017
    1. Ulug P, Sweeting MJ, Allmen RS, Thompson SG, Powell JT, SWAN collaborators. Morphological suitability for endovascular repair, non-intervention rates, and operative mortality in women and men assessed for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Lancet 2017;389(10088):2482-91. [DOI: ] [PMID: 28455148 ] - PMC - PubMed
United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators 2010
    1. United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm in patients physically ineligible for open repair. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362(20):1872-80. - PubMed
US Preventive Task Force
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019;322(22):2211-18. [DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.18928] - DOI - PubMed
Wanhainen 2016
    1. Wanhainen A, Hultgren R, Linné A, Holst J, Gottsäter A, Langenskiöld M, et al. Outcome of the Swedish Nationwide Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program. Circulation 2016;134(16):1141-8. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Wanhainen 2019
    1. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2019;57(1):8-93. [DOI: ] [PMID: ] - PubMed
Wilt 2006
    1. Wilt TJ, Lederle FA, MacDonald R, Jonk YC, Rector TS, Kane RL. Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 2006;144:1-113. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Ballard 1999
    1. Ballard DJ, Filardo G, Fowkes FG, Powell JT. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ballard 2008
    1. Ballard DJ, Filardo G, Fowkes G, Powell JT. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Filardo 2012
    1. Filardo G, Powell JT, Martinez MAM, Ballard DJ. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Filardo 2015
    1. Filardo G, Powell JT, Martinez MAM, Ballard DJ. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types