Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 24:13:2199-2207.
doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S258678. eCollection 2020.

Evaluation of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 as Diagnostic Markers for Early Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations

Evaluation of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 as Diagnostic Markers for Early Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Thuan Huynh Quang et al. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. .

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was evaluating the early diagnostic value of two specific tubular markers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in diabetes nephropathy.

Patients and methods: Cross-sectional study was carried in three groups of patients from 10/2017 to 10/2018 in Military Hospital 103. Group I included 30 healthy peoples with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine albumin creatinine ratio (uACR) <30 mg/g. Group II included 30 type 2 diabetic patients having uACR <30 mg/g, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Group III included 30 type 2 diabetic patients having uACR >30 mg/g, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results: Urine KIM-1 and NGAL increased progressively from control group (57.29 ± 25.91 pg/mL; 25.71 ± 13.69 ng/mL) to the group of diabetic patients with uACR <30 mg/g (167.06 ± 44.01 pg/mL; 37.42 ± 10.89 ng/mL) and the group of diabetic patients with uACR ≥30 mg/g) (p < 0.05). There were moderate correlations between KIM-1 (r = 0.48, p < 0.05) and NGAL (r = 0.45, p < 0.05) with uACR. There was a mild correlation between KIM-1 and NGAL (r = 0.29, p < 0.05). KIM-1 and NGAL are the independent tests to detect diabetic nephropathy. The sensivity and specificity of KIM-1 with cut-off value of 174.95 pg/mL were 62.37% and 73.48%, respectively; the sensivity and specificity of NGAL with cut-off value of 35.2 ng/mL were 60.45% and 70.37%, respectively.

Conclusion: KIM-1 and NGAL in urine are independent markers for early diagnostic diabetic nephropathy.

Keywords: albumin urine; diabetic kidney disease; urine albumin creatinin ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Concentration of urine KIM-1. Notes: The concentration of KIM-1 in urine increased from healthy control to diabetes groups. The group II was significantly higher than group I and group III had the highest concentration. P-values in Mann–Whitney test were showed in figure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concentration of urine NGAL. Notes: The concentration of urine NGAL increased from group I to III. The differences between groups were significant. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare two groups and calculate p value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves analysis of NGAL, KIM-1, NGAL/Cr, KIM-1/Cr in diabetes patients with nephropathy group versus diabetes patients without nephropathy group. Notes: Receiver operating characteristic curves for urine markers for diagnosing nephropathy in T2D: (A) Urinary KIM-1 with AUC=0.576; (B) Urinary KIM-1/creatinine (uKIM-1/Cr) with AUC= 0.68; (C) Urinary NGAL with AUC = 0.692; (D) Urinary NGAL/creatinine (uNGAL/Cr) with AUC = 0.697. Abbreviations: uKIM-1, urinary KIM-1; uKIM-1/Cr, urinary KIM-1/Creatinin; uNGAL, urinary NGAL; uNGAL/Cr, urinary NGAL/Creatinin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The correlation between NGAL and KIM-1. Notes: r, p-value with pearson correlation between urine NGAL and urine KIM-1 were showed on the figure.

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Elsevier BV. 2019;57:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(1):7. doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Gregg EW. Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia. 2019;62(1):3–16. - PubMed
    1. Thomas B. The global burden of diabetic kidney disease: time trends and gender gaps. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(4):18. doi:10.1007/s11892-019-1133-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dagenais GR, Gerstein HC, Zhang X, et al. Variations in diabetes prevalence in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: results from the prospective urban and rural epidemiological study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(5):780–787. doi:10.2337/dc15-2338 - DOI - PubMed