Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 18:64.
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4404. eCollection 2020.

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - handbook for qualified systematic reviews

Affiliations
Review

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - handbook for qualified systematic reviews

Erik Kristoffer Arnesen et al. Food Nutr Res. .

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) constitute a major part of the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNRs). The step-by-step procedure used to develop SRs has evolved considerably over time and is often tailored to fit the exposure and outcomes in focus.

Objective: To describe a detailed procedure for developing qualified SRs commissioned by the NNR2022 project.

Design: Scrutinizing procedures of recent SRs commissioned by leading national food and health authorities or international food and health organizations.

Results: The following eight steps must be included when developing qualified SRs for the NNR2022 project: 1) define research question, 2) protocol development, 3) literature search, 4) screening and selection of studies, 5) data extraction, 6) assessing risk of bias, 7) synthesis and grading of total strength of evidence, and 8) reporting according to certain standards.

Discussion: This guide is based on the guidelines developed for the fifth edition of NNR but includes some important new domains in order to adhere to more recent, authoritative standards.

Conclusion: All qualified SRs in the NNR2022 project will follow the protocol described here.

Keywords: Nordic and Baltic countries; dietary reference values; evidence-based nutrition; food-based dietary guidelines; national food and health authorities; nutrient recommendations; systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

See sections on “Conflicts of interest” and “Sponsors of the NNR2022 project” in the main text of the companion article (1).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The individual steps involved when conducting SRs in NNR2022 project.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of a risk of bias graph figure, showing the proportion of studies with low, unclear, or high risk of bias. Reprinted from the Cochrane Handbook (20).

References

    1. Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. . The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food Nutr Res 2020. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. . The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020; 64:4403. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordic Council of Ministers A guide for conducting SLR for NNR5. How to undertake a systematic review of nutrition recommendations. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2014.
    1. Lichtenstein AH, Yetley EA, Lau J. Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition: nutritional research series, Vol 1. AHRQ Technical Reviews. Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Fogelholm M, Anderssen S, Gunnarsdottir I, Lahti-Koski M. Dietary macronutrients and food consumption as determinants of long-term weight change in adult populations: a systematic literature review. Food Nutr Res 2012; 56. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.19103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed