A preliminary comparison of the efficacy of online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) stress management interventions for social and healthcare workers
- PMID: 32613644
- DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13074
A preliminary comparison of the efficacy of online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) stress management interventions for social and healthcare workers
Abstract
Social and healthcare workers have been shown to experience greater levels of illness, depression and burnout as a result of chronic workplace stress. The purpose of this study was to examine whether brief online ACT and CBT interventions could reduce the experience of stress and burnout in employees, while also improving mental health and psychological flexibility. A total of 42 individuals working within the social and healthcare professions were randomly assigned to either a 2-week online ACT or CBT intervention. Recruitment was undertaken internationally, although the majority of participants were based in Ireland at the time of their participation (79%). Participants' perceived stress, burnout, mental health and work-related psychological flexibility were assessed at baseline and post-treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted on all data. Outcomes indicated that both interventions resulted in significant improvements in stress, burnout and mental health scores from baseline to post-treatment. No significant differences were observed between ACT and CBT conditions, or in psychological flexibility scores from baseline to post-treatment. Reliable Change Index (RCI) scores indicated that clinically significant improvements in stress and mental health were seen in 42% and 19% of programme-completers, respectively. These results provide preliminary evidence for the usefulness of brief internet-delivered ACT and CBT interventions for the treatment of occupational stress and its comorbid symptoms. Online programmes with a longer duration and additional therapist support should be evaluated, as these may improve the outcomes of future interventions.
Keywords: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; Cognitive-behavioural Therapy; burnout; online interventions; stress.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J. A., Busse, R., Clarke, H., … Shamian, J. (2001). Nurses’ reports on hospital care in five countries. Health Affairs, 20, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43
-
- Akroyd, D., Caison, A., & Adams, R. D. (2002). Burnout in radiation therapists: The predictive value of selected stressors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 52(3), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02688-8
-
- Amico, K. R. (2009). Percent total attrition: A poor metric for study rigor in hosted intervention designs. American Journal of Public Health, 99(9), 1567-1575. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.134767
-
- A-Tjak, J. G. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365764
-
- Aziz, A. (2004). Sources of perceived stress among American medical doctors: A cross-cultural perspective. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600410797864
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
