Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 2;20(1):84.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00647-w.

Systemic therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after discontinuation of immune-oncology and VEGF targeted therapy combinations

Affiliations

Systemic therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after discontinuation of immune-oncology and VEGF targeted therapy combinations

Yasser Ged et al. BMC Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Several phase 3 studies reported positive results for combinations of Immune-Oncology (IO) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) targeted therapies in patients with metastatic clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC). However, there are limited data on outcomes to systemic therapy after IO-VEGF combinations.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with metastatic ccRCC treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic who initiated systemic therapy post IO-VEGF including combinations with VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IO-TKI) and combinations with the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (IO-Bev). The study objectives were to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on systemic therapy post IO-VEGF. RECIST v1.1 criteria were used to determine radiological responses and progression. Survival estimates were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test from the start of systemic therapy post IO-VEGF to the event of interest.

Results: A total of fifty-nine patients were treated post discontinuation of IO-VEGF regimens which included IO-Bev (n = 35; 59%) and IO-TKI (n = 24; 41%). Fifty-eight patients (98%) received IO-VEGF regimens as part of a clinical trial. Subsequent therapies included cabozantinib (n = 22; 37%), axitinib (n = 18; 31%), pazopanib (n = 4; 7%), lenvatinib and everolimus (n = 4; 7%), mTOR inhibitor monotherapy (n = 3; 5%), axitinib and dalantercept (n = 2; 3%), sunitinib (n = 1; 2%), sorafenib (n = 1; 2%), and treatment with agents on unreported clinical trials (n = 4; 7%). Patients treated on unreported clinical trials were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Post IO-VEGF, the ORR was 25% and median PFS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.2-24.5). Median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI, 12-NE) and 12 months OS rate was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.6-74.9). We observed no differences post IO-VEGF OS when comparing IO- TKI vs IO-Bev (Log-rank p = 0.73).

Conclusions: Post IO-VEGF, most patients received VEGFR-TKIs. In this setting, VEGFR-TKIs demonstrated clinical activity and remain a viable option for salvage therapy after progression on IO-VEGF.

Keywords: IO combinations; Immune-oncology; RCC; Survival; VEGF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yasser Ged has no relationships to disclose.

Ruby Gupta has no relationships to disclose.

Cihan Duzgol has no relationships to disclose.

Andrea Knezevic has no relationships to disclose.

Natalie Shapnik has no relationships to disclose.

Ritesh Kotecha has no relationships to disclose.

Martin H. Voss reports receiving commercial research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Genentech/Roche. Honoraria from Novartis. Travel/accommodation from Eisai, Novartis, and Takeda. Consultant/advisory board member for- Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Calithera Biosciences, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Exelixis, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Natera, Novartis, and Pfizer.

Darren R. Feldman reports research support from Novartis and Seattle Genetics.

Oguz Akin has no relationships to disclose.

Sujata Patil has no relationships to disclose.

Robert J. Motzer reports receiving commercial research grants from Pfizer, Eisai, Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, and Novartis, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Pfizer, Merck, Genentech, Exelixis, Eisai, and Novartis.

Brian Rini reports receiving research funding from Pfizer, Merck, GNE/Roche, Peloton, Aveo, Astra-Zeneca, and BMS, and is consultant/advisory board member for BMS, Pfizer, Aveo, GNE/Roche, Compugen, Merck, Corvus, and Exelixis, and holds stocks in PTC Therapeutics.

Chung-Han Lee reports receiving commercial research grants from BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Pfizer, and Calithera, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Amgen, BMS, Exelixis, and Eisai.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan Meier curve estimating PFS for 55 patients from the next line of systemic therapy for kidney cancer after discontinuation of IO-VEGF. Median PFS was 12 months (95% CI, 8.2–24.5) and 12-month PFS probability was 49.6% (95% CI, 33.2–64.0). Median follow up time for progression-free survivors was 8.5 months (range: 0, 30). PFS (Progression Free Survival), IO-VEGF (Immune-Oncology and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor targeted therapy)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan Meier curve estimating OS for 55 patients from the next line of systemic therapy for kidney cancer after discontinuation of IO-VEGF. Median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI, 12.0– NE) and 12-month OS probability was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.6–74.9). Median follow up time for survivors was 18 months (range: 0, 44). OS (Overal Survival), IO-VEGF (Immune-Oncology and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor targeted therapy)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan Meier curve comparing OS for 55 patients from the next line of systemic therapy for kidney cancer after discontinuation of IO-VEGF by prior received IO-TKI vs. IO-Bev with no statistical difference between the groups (Log-rank p = 0.73). OS (Overall Survival), IO-VEGF (Immune-Oncology and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor targeted therapy), IO-TKI (IO-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor), IO-Bev (IO-Bevacizumab)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan Meier curve comparing OS for 55 patients from the next line of systemic therapy for kidney cancer after discontinuation of IO-VEGF by subsequent therapy: Cabozantinib vs. Axitinib vs. Other agents with no statistical difference among the three (Log-rank p = 0.25). OS (Overall Survival), IO-VEGF (Immune-Oncology and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor targeted therapy)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–1813. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selby MJ, Engelhardt JJ, Johnston RJ, Lu LS, Han M, Thudium K, et al. Preclinical development of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab combination immunotherapy: mouse tumor models, in vitro functional studies, and cynomolgus macaque toxicology. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161779. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmittnaegel M, Rigamonti N, Kadioglu E, Cassara A, Wyser Rmili C, Kiialainen A, et al. Dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGFA inhibition elicits antitumor immunity that is enhanced by PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(385):eaak9670. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9670. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Aren Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(14):1277–1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

Supplementary concepts