Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct:80:45-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.04.056. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Quality of care after AKI development in the hospital: Consensus from the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) conference

Affiliations

Quality of care after AKI development in the hospital: Consensus from the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) conference

Etienne Macedo et al. Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Quality improvement has been identified as an important goal in the care of patients with AKI. Different settings can be targeted to improve AKI care, broadly classified these include the inpatient and outpatient environments. In this paper, we will emphasize quality indicators associated with the management and secondary prevention of AKI in hospitalized patients to limit the severity, duration, and complications.

Methods: During the 22nd Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference, a multidisciplinary group of experts discussed the evidence and used a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus on recommendations for AKI-related quality indicators (QIs) and care processes to improve patient outcomes. The management and secondary prevention of AKI in hospitalized patients were discussed, and recommendations were summarized.

Results: The first step in optimizing the quality of AKI management is the determination of baseline performance. Data regarding each institution's/center's performance can provide a reference point from which to benchmark quality efforts. Quality program initiatives should prioritize achievable goals likely to have the highest impact according to the setting and context. Key AKI quality metrics should include improvement in timely recognition, appropriate diagnostic workup, and implementation of known interventions that limit progression and severity, facilitating recovery, and mitigating AKI-associated complications. We propose the Recognition-Action-Results framework to plan, measure, and report the progress toward improving AKI management quality.

Conclusions: These recommendations identified and outlined an approach to define and evaluate the quality of AKI management in hospitalized patients.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Outcomes; Quality improvement initiative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Timing and measures to early recognize and treat complications. The key steps for managing established AKI includes preventing progression, limiting complications, function. Identification of risk and facilitating the recovery of kidney factors for AKI, early detection, and adequate monitoring can potentially reduce the severity and duration of disease and associated complications.

References

    1. Chua HR, et al. Extended mortality and chronic kidney disease after septic acute kidney injury. J Intensive Care Med 2018. 885066618764617. - PubMed
    1. Fiorentino M, et al. Acute Kidney Injury to Chronic Kidney Disease Transition. Contrib Nephrol 2018;193:45–54. - PubMed
    1. Forni LG, et al. Renal recovery after acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med 2017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Death NCEiPOa. Acute Kidney Injury: Adding Insult to Injury. Improving the quality of Healthcare; 2009.
    1. James MT, et al. Improving prevention, early recognition and management of acute kidney injury after major surgery: results of a planning meeting with multidisciplinary stakeholders. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2014;1:20. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types