Conflict Management in the ICU
- PMID: 32618689
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004440
Conflict Management in the ICU
Abstract
Objectives: To provide a concise review of data and literature pertaining to the etiologies of conflict in the ICU, as well as current approaches to conflict management.
Data sources: Detailed search strategy using PubMed and OVID Medline for English language articles describing conflict in the ICU as well as prevention and management strategies.
Study selection: Descriptive and interventional studies addressing conflict, bioethics, clinical ethics consultation, palliative care medicine, conflict management, and conflict mediation in critical care.
Data extraction: Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and the following aspects of each manuscript were identified, abstracted, and analyzed: setting, study population, aims, methods, results, and relevant implications for critical care practice and training.
Data synthesis: Conflict frequently erupts in the ICU between patients and families and care teams, as well as within and between care teams. Conflict engenders a host of untoward consequences for patients, families, clinicians, and facilities rendering abrogating conflict a key priority for all. Conflict etiologies are diverse but understood in terms of a framework of triggers. Identifying and de-escalating conflict before it become intractable is a preferred approach. Approaches to conflict management include utilizing clinical ethics consultation, and palliative care medicine clinicians. Conflict Management is a new technique that all ICU clinicians may use to identify and manage conflict. Entrenched conflict appears to benefit from Bioethics Mediation, an approach that uses a neutral, unaligned mediator to guide parties to a mutually acceptable resolution.
Conclusions: Conflict commonly occurs in the ICU around difficult and complex decision-making. Patients, families, clinicians, and institutions suffer undesirable consequences resulting from conflict, establishing conflict prevention and resolution as key priorities. A variety of approaches may successfully identify, manage, and prevent conflict including techniques that are utilizable by all team members in support of clinical excellence.
References
-
- Huff NG, Nadig N, Ford DW, et al. Therapeutic alliance between the caregivers of critical illness survivors and intensive care unit clinicians. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015; 12:1646–1653
-
- Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, et al. Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29:197–201
-
- Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, et al.; Conflicus Study Investigators and for the Ethics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care MedicinePrevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: The conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 180:853–860
-
- Schuster RA, Hong SY, Arnold RM, et al. Investigating conflict in ICUs-is the clinicians’ perspective enough?. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42:328–335
-
- Paul Olson TJ, Brasel KJ, Redmann AJ, et al. Surgeon-reported conflict with intensivists about postoperative goals of care. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148:29–35
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical