Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;32(4):255-262.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000644.

An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies

Affiliations
Review

An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies

Lucy Liu et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review the current literature on the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs) is increasing as a result of the increasing cesarean section rate, improved diagnostic capabilities, and a growing awareness. CSPs are associated with significant morbidity and early diagnosis is key. Diagnosis is best achieved with transvaginal ultrasound. Sonographic diagnostic criteria have been developed over decades and recently endorsed by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and other professional societies. The current categorization system differentiates CSPs that are endogenic or 'on the scar' from those that are exogenic or 'in the niche'. Following diagnosis, the challenge remains in determining the optimal management as multiple modalities can be considered. Studies have demonstrated the favorable outcomes with combined local and systemic methotrexate, surgical excision through multiple routes, and adjunctive therapies, such as uterine artery embolization or uterine balloons. The current evidence is insufficient to identify a single best treatment course and a combined approach to treatment is often required.

Summary: Successful outcomes while minimizing complications can be achieved with a multidisciplinary, collaborative effort. Guidelines for cesarean scar pregnancies will continue to evolve as the published reports grow.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392:1341–1348.
    1. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: placenta accreta spectrum. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132:e259–e275.
    1. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Electronic address pso, Miller R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Bannerman CG. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020.
    1. Cali G, Forlani F, Timor-Tritsch IE, et al. Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50:100–104.
    1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis and pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2019; 46:797–811.

Substances