Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Mar 1;41(3):620-629.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002901.

UVEITIS TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT

Affiliations
Observational Study

UVEITIS TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT

Thibaud Mathis et al. Retina. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the real-life efficacy and safety of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant in uveitis.

Methods: This retrospective observational multicentric study included 152 eyes treated exclusively by 358 dexamethasone implant injections. The main outcome measures included change in the best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and vitreous haze score.

Results: Patients were treated with dexamethasone implant for macular edema (51.3%), vitritis with macular edema (40.1%), vitritis (5.3%), and other causes (3.3%). The mean duration of follow-up was 19.0 months. The mean gain in best-corrected visual acuity during follow-up was +12.1 letters. An improvement in best-corrected visual acuity ≥5, 10, and 15 letters was found in 64.5, 50.7, and 35.5% of cases, respectively. 59.7% of eyes with macular edema at baseline were found to be anatomical responders. Vitritis resolution (vitreous haze = 0+) was obtained in 81.4% of cases. Ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure ≥25 mmHg and/or gain ≥10 mmHg from baseline) occurred in 28.3% of patients. No filtering surgery/laser therapy was required. A total of 40.2% of phakic subjects underwent cataract surgery on average 11.2 months after the first injection.

Conclusion: This study confirms the efficacy and safety of the dexamethasone implant in noninfectious uveitis. Cataract and ocular hypertension were not uncommon but easily manageable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T. Mathis declared conflicts of interest from Allergan, Bayer, and Novartis; M. Weber declared conflicts of interest from Allergan; P. Denis declared conflicts of interest from Allergan and Novartis; B. Bodaghi declared conflicts of interest from AbbVie, Allergan, Alimera, and Santen; L. Kodjikian declared conflicts of interest from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, and Théa. None of the other authors has any financial interests to disclose.

References

    1. Bodaghi B, Cassoux N, Wechsler B, et al. Chronic severe uveitis: etiology and visual outcome in 927 patients from a single center. Medicine (Baltimore) 2001;80:263–270.
    1. de Smet MD, Taylor SRJ, Bodaghi B, et al. Understanding uveitis: the impact of research on visual outcomes. Prog Retin Eye Res 2011;30:452–470.
    1. Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group, Kempen JH, Kempen JH, Altaweel MM, et al. Randomized comparison of systemic anti-inflammatory therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide implant for intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis: the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1916–1926.
    1. Lowder C, Belfort R, Lightman S, et al. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:545–553.
    1. Goldstein DA, Godfrey DG, Hall A, et al. Intraocular pressure in patients with uveitis treated with fluocinolone acetonide implants. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1478–1485.

Publication types