Could anti-CD20 therapy jeopardise the efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine?
- PMID: 32619884
- PMCID: PMC7315961
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.017
Could anti-CD20 therapy jeopardise the efficacy of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine?
Abstract
A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 might represent the most promising approach to halt durably the current COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that anti-CD20 therapy may jeopardise the efficacy of such a vaccine. This is regrettable because patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy (i.e. those with haematologic malignancies or autoimmune disorders) are particularly at risk of severe COVID-19 and, as such, are the most in need of a vaccine. Here, we review the reasons why anti-CD20 therapy may abrogate or diminish the efficacy of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and we draw physicians' attention towards this potential risk so that it can be considered when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of anti-CD20 therapy during the current pandemic.
Keywords: Anti-CD20 antibody; COVID-19; Rituximab; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement R.H. reports receiving honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Gilead, Kite, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, and Celgene. R.L. reports receiving honoraria from Apexigen, Beigene, Forty-Seven, Teneobio, Sutro, Checkmate, Nurix, Dragonfly, Quadriga, GigaGen, Abpro, Spolight, Xcella, Immunoscore, and Walking Fish. G.C. reports receiving honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Abbvie, Sanofi, Gilead, and Janssen. P.A. reports receiving honoraria from Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Affimed, Adaptive, Infinity, ADC Therapeutics, Celgene, Morphosys, Daiichi Sankyo, Miltenyi, Tessa, GenMab, C4, Enterome; has received research funding from Genentech, Merck, BMS, Affimed, Adaptive, Roche, Tensha, and IGM.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
