Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;405(5):657-664.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01917-9. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Ammar Khan  1   2 , Dyre Kleive  3   4 , Einar Martin Aandahl  5 , Bjarte Fosby  5 , Pål-Dag Line  5   3 , Eric Dorenberg  6 , Steinar Guvåg  5 , Knut Jørgen Labori  4
Affiliations

Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery

Ammar Khan et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic stent placement for portal vein (PV) stenosis after liver transplantation (LT) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery.

Methods: Retrospective study of 455 patients who underwent LT and 522 patients who underwent resection of the pancreatic head between June 2011 and February 2016. Technical success, clinical success, patency, and complications were evaluated for both groups.

Results: A total of 23 patients were confirmed to have postoperative PV stenosis and were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement. The technical success rate was 100%, the clinical success rate was 80%, and the long-term stent patency was 91.3% for the entire study population. Two procedure-related hemorrhages and two early stent thromboses occurred in the HPB group while no complications occurred in the LT group. A literature review of selected studies reporting PV stent placement for the treatment of PV stenosis after HPB surgery and LT showed a technical success rate of 78-100%, a clinical success rate of 72-100%, and a long-term patency of 57-100%, whereas the procedure-related complication rate varied from 0-33.3%.

Conclusions: Percutaneous transhepatic PV stent is a safe and effective treatment for postoperative PV stenosis/occlusion in patients undergoing LT regardless of symptoms. Due to increased risk of complications, the indication for percutaneous PV stent placement after HPB surgery should be limited to patients with clinical symptoms after an individual assessment.

Keywords: Interventional radiology; Liver transplantation; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Patency; Portal vein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Tanaka N, Fujii A, Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Takeda K. Portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic and biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension: initial experience. Radiology. 2001;220(1):150–156. - PubMed
    1. Olcott EW, Ring EJ, Roberts JP, Ascher NL, Lake JR, Gordon RL. Percutaneous transhepatic portal vein angioplasty and stent placement after liver transplantation: early experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1990;1(1):17–22. - PubMed
    1. Haskal ZJ, Naji A. Treatment of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation with percutaneous thrombolysis and stent placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993;4(6):789–792. - PubMed
    1. Yamakado K, Tanaka N, Nakatsuka A, Matsumura K, Takase K, Takeda K. Clinical efficacy of portal vein stent placement in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the main portal vein. J Hepatol. 1999;30(4):660–668. - PubMed
    1. Funaki B, Rosenblum JD, Leef JA, Hackworth CA, Szymski GX, Alonso EM, Piper JB, Whitington PF. Portal vein stenosis in children with segmental liver transplants: treatment with percutaneous transhepatic venoplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(1):161–165. - PubMed