Definition and Prospective Assessment of Functional Recovery After Liver Transplantation: A New Objective Consensus-Based Metric for Safe Discharge
- PMID: 32621369
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.25841
Definition and Prospective Assessment of Functional Recovery After Liver Transplantation: A New Objective Consensus-Based Metric for Safe Discharge
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Liver Transpl. 2021 Nov;27(11):1686-1687. doi: 10.1002/lt.26256. Epub 2021 Sep 6. Liver Transpl. 2021. PMID: 34486809 No abstract available.
Abstract
Standardized discharge criteria are critical to reduce premature discharge and avoid unnecessary hospital stays. No such criteria exist for patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). To achieve a consensus-based checklist of criteria for safe patient discharge after LT, this mixed-method study included the following: a systematic literature review and expert discussion to draft a first checklist of post-LT discharge criteria, defining patient recovery and indications for hospital discharge (functional recovery); an exploratory online electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study; a single-center pilot study to test checklist feasibility; and a final e-Delphi study with an extended interdisciplinary expert panel to validate the final checklist. The first round provided a 10-point discharge checklist with 5 patient-centered items derived from discharge criteria after liver surgery and 5 graft-centered items derived from expert discussion. The restricted panel (9 experts) e-Delphi provided 100% consensus after the second round, with slight modifications to the criteria. During the pilot study, 19 of 45 (42.2%) patients included fulfilled the complete checklist (100% of 10 items) after median (IQR) 16 (8-21) days (functional recovery) and a length of stay of 20 (9-24) days. The item with the lowest completion rate was minimum serum tacrolimus level in the target on 2 consecutive blood samples (n = 21; 47%), achieved at 13 (9-15) days. The extended panel (66 experts) e-Delphi provided 95%-98% consensus after the third round, with slight modifications of the criteria. This study provided substantial consensus on discharge criteria after LT. We anticipate that these criteria will be useful in clinical practice to guide patient discharge and increase the comparability of results between future studies.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Comment in
-
Discharge Readiness After Liver Transplant Is Not One Size Fits All.Liver Transpl. 2020 Oct;26(10):1219-1220. doi: 10.1002/lt.25864. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Liver Transpl. 2020. PMID: 32772504 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dienstag JL , Cosimi AB . Liver transplantation-a vision realized. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1483-1485.
-
- Montano-Loza AJ , Meza-Junco J , Prado CMM , Lieffers JR , Baracos VE , Bain VG , Sawyer MB . Muscle wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:166-173.
-
- Washburn WK , Meo NA , Halff GA , Roberts JP , Feng S . Factors influencing liver transplant length of stay at two large-volume transplant centers. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1570-1578.
-
- Keegan MT , Kramer DJ . Perioperative care of the liver transplant patient. Crit Care Clin 2016;32:453-473.
-
- Mourad MM , Liossis C , Gunson BK , Mergental H , Isaac J , Muiesan P , et al. Etiology and management of hepatic artery thrombosis after adult liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2014;20:713-723.