Interaction among different sensory units within a single fungiform papilla in the frog tongue
- PMID: 3262148
- PMCID: PMC2216153
- DOI: 10.1085/jgp.91.5.685
Interaction among different sensory units within a single fungiform papilla in the frog tongue
Abstract
The possible interaction among different sensory units in the frog tongue was studied using several single papillae dually innervated by the medial and lateral branches of the glossopharyngeal (IXth) nerve. The afferent activity in one branch exposed to NaCl stimulation of the papilla revealed marked inhibition after antidromic electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 30 s, and 3 V) of the other branch. The degree of inhibition depended on the number of sensory responses observed in the electrically stimulated branch as well as the nature of the stimulated sensory units. Statistical analysis suggested that antidromic activation of gustatory units conducting the responses to NaCl and quinine and slowly adapting mechanosensitive units produced a large antidromic inhibition amounting to 19-25%, but that of gustatory units conducting the responses to acetic acid and rapidly adapting mechanosensitive units gave rise to only a slight inhibition. To examine the differential effects of these sensory units in antidromic inhibition, antidromic impulses were evoked by chemical stimulation of the adjacent papilla neuronally connected with the dually innervated papilla under study. Antidromic volleys of impulses elicited by NaCl or quinine stimulation produced a large inhibition of the afferent activity in the other branch, as induced by NaCl stimulation of the dually innervated papilla. Plausible mechanisms of synaptic interaction in peripheral gustatory systems are considered.
Similar articles
-
Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve.J Neurophysiol. 1988 Aug;60(2):478-98. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478. J Neurophysiol. 1988. PMID: 3171639
-
Response properties of cerebellar neurons to stimulation of the frog glossopharyngeal nerve and tongue.Brain Res Bull. 1987 Apr;18(4):491-9. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(87)90114-6. Brain Res Bull. 1987. PMID: 3496939
-
Selective depressant action of antidromic impulses on gustatory nerve signals.J Gen Physiol. 1986 Aug;88(2):219-36. doi: 10.1085/jgp.88.2.219. J Gen Physiol. 1986. PMID: 3489068 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of antidromic stimulation of the glossopharyngeal nerve on afferent discharges occurring with and without sensory stimulation of the frog tongue.Neurosci Lett. 1985 Sep 16;60(1):95-9. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(85)90387-8. Neurosci Lett. 1985. PMID: 3877259
-
Responses to umami substances in taste bud cells innervated by the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves.J Nutr. 2000 Apr;130(4S Suppl):950S-3S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.4.950S. J Nutr. 2000. PMID: 10736359 Review.
Cited by
-
In situ Ca2+ imaging reveals neurotransmitter receptors for glutamate in taste receptor cells.J Neurosci. 2000 Nov 1;20(21):7978-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-07978.2000. J Neurosci. 2000. PMID: 11050118 Free PMC article.
-
Glutamate may be an efferent transmitter that elicits inhibition in mouse taste buds.PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030662. Epub 2012 Jan 26. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22292013 Free PMC article.
-
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Reduces Taste-Evoked ATP Secretion from Mouse Taste Buds.J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 16;35(37):12714-24. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0100-15.2015. J Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26377461 Free PMC article.
-
Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Aug;18(8):485-497. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.68. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28655883 Free PMC article. Review.