Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Feb;116(2):239-277.
doi: 10.1111/add.15185. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Fetal safety of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Fetal safety of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lauren Taylor et al. Addiction. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background and aims: Smoking in pregnancy causes substantial avoidable harm to mothers and offspring; nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may prevent this, and is used to help women to quit. A recently updated Cochrane Review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating impacts of NRT in pregnancy focuses primarily on efficacy data, but also reports adverse impacts from NRT. Here we identify and summarize NRT impacts on adverse pregnancy outcomes reported in non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs).

Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs and non-RCT studies of NRT in pregnancy, with design-specific risk of bias assessment and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) criteria applied to selected outcomes.

Findings: Relevant Cochrane Review findings are reported alongside those from this new review. Seven RCTs were included; n = 2340. Nine meta-analyses were performed; non-statistically significant estimates indicated potentially reduced risk from NRT compared with smoking for mean birth weight, low birth weight, preterm birth, intensive care admissions, neonatal death, congenital anomalies and caesarean section and potentially increased risks for miscarriage and stillbirth. GRADE assessment for mean birth weight and miscarriage outcomes indicated 'low' confidence in findings. Twenty-three non-RCTs were included; n = 931 163. Eleven large studies from five routine health-care cohorts reported clinical outcomes; 12 small studies investigated mainly physiological outcomes within in-patient women given NRT. Findings from meta-analyses for congenital anomalies, stillbirth and preterm birth were underpowered and not in a consistent direction; GRADE assessment of confidence in findings was 'very low'. Routine health-care studies were of higher quality, but implications of reported findings were unclear as there was inadequate measurement and reporting of women's smoking.

Conclusions: Available evidence from randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies does not currently provide clear evidence as to whether maternal use of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy is harmful to the fetus.

Keywords: Birth outcomes; fetal health; health outcomes; nicotine replacement therapy; pregnancy; smoking; smoking cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Batstra L., Hadders-Algra M., Neeleman J. Effect of antenatal exposure to maternal smoking on behavioural problems and academic achievement in childhood: prospective evidence from a Dutch birth cohort. Early Hum Dev 2003; 75: 21-33.
    1. DiFranza JR, Lew RA. Effect of maternal cigarette smoking on pregnancy complications and sudden infant death syndrome. J Fam Pract 1995; 40: 385-394.
    1. Hackshaw A., Rodeck C., Boniface S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 589-604.
    1. Statistics Team NHS Digital. Statistics on Women's Smoking Status at Time of Delivery: NHS digital. Government Statistical Service; 2019. Available at: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.digital.nhs.uk%2F... (accessed 26 March 2019).
    1. National Health Service Information Centre. Infant Feeding Survey 2010. Early results. London, UK: National Health Service Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2011.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources