Editorial Commentary: Revision Hip Surgery After Arthroscopy-What Went Wrong? Are There Second Chances?
- PMID: 32624129
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.005
Editorial Commentary: Revision Hip Surgery After Arthroscopy-What Went Wrong? Are There Second Chances?
Abstract
Hip arthroscopy allows minimally invasive treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with labral tears. Over the last 2 decades, the indications and techniques for treatment of FAI have evolved, and complex pathology can now be treated arthroscopically. Short- and medium-term patient-reported outcomes demonstrate the reliability of hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI, although a subset of patients fail to achieve desired results and require revision surgery. The indications for revision surgery after a primary hip arthroscopy are not well described in a large series, and most reviews focus on revision arthroscopy at the exclusion of open surgery (notably periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty). Furthermore, patient-reported outcomes after these revision procedures have not been recently summarized.
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Indications and Outcomes of Secondary Hip Procedures After Failed Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul;36(7):1992-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Arthroscopy. 2020. PMID: 32145299
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
