Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 5;15(10):e04911.
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4911. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Re-evaluation of oxidised starch (E 1404), monostarch phosphate (E 1410), distarch phosphate (E 1412), phosphated distarch phosphate (E 1413), acetylated distarch phosphate (E 1414), acetylated starch (E 1420), acetylated distarch adipate (E 1422), hydroxypropyl starch (E 1440), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (E 1442), starch sodium octenyl succinate (E 1450), acetylated oxidised starch (E 1451) and starch aluminium octenyl succinate (E 1452) as food additives

Re-evaluation of oxidised starch (E 1404), monostarch phosphate (E 1410), distarch phosphate (E 1412), phosphated distarch phosphate (E 1413), acetylated distarch phosphate (E 1414), acetylated starch (E 1420), acetylated distarch adipate (E 1422), hydroxypropyl starch (E 1440), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (E 1442), starch sodium octenyl succinate (E 1450), acetylated oxidised starch (E 1451) and starch aluminium octenyl succinate (E 1452) as food additives

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of 12 modified starches (E 1404, E 1410, E 1412, E 1413, E 1414, E 1420, E 1422, E 1440, E 1442, E 1450, E 1451 and E 1452) authorised as food additives in the EU in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 and previously evaluated by JECFA and the SCF. Both committees allocated an acceptable daily intake (ADI) 'not specified'. In humans, modified starches are not absorbed intact but significantly hydrolysed by intestinal enzymes and then fermented by the intestinal microbiota. Using the read-across approach, the Panel considered that adequate data on short- and long-term toxicity and carcinogenicity, and reproductive toxicity are available. Based on in silico analyses, modified starches are considered not to be of genotoxic concern. No treatment-related effects relevant for human risk assessment were observed in rats fed very high levels of modified starches (up to 31,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day). Modified starches (e.g. E 1450) were well tolerated in humans up to a single dose of 25,000 mg/person. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of modified starches as food additives at the reported uses and use levels for the general population and that there is no need for a numerical ADI. The combined exposure to E 1404-E 1451 at the 95th percentile of the refined (brand-loyal) exposure assessment scenario for the general population was up to 3,053 mg/kg bw per day. Exposure to E 1452 for food supplement consumers only at the 95th percentile was up to 22.1 mg/kg bw per day.

Keywords: E 1404; E 1410; E 1412; E 1413; E 1414; E 1420; E 1422; E 1440; E 1442; E 1450; E 1451; E 1452; modified starches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural formula of amylose and an example of branching in amylopectin
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structural representation of a phosphate cross‐link between two glucopyranose units in distarch phosphate
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structural representation of distarch adipate; the acetyl groups present in acetylated distarch adipate are not shown (Reproduced with permission of CCR Press, from Xie et al., 2005)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structural representation of hydroxypropyl starch (Reproduced with permission of CCR Press, from Xie et al., 2005)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Structural representation of starch sodium octenyl succinate (Documentation provided to EFSA n. 1)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Alerting alkyl hydroperoxide group present in distarch adipate
Figure 7
Figure 7
Alerting acetate ester group present in the three acetylated starches

References

    1. Ačkar Ɖ, Babić J, Jozinović A, Miličević B, Jokić S, Miličević R, Rajič M and Šubarić D, 2015. Starch modification by organic acids and their derivatives: a review. Molecules, 20, 19554–19570. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson TA, Filer LJ Jr, Fomon SJ, Andersen DW, Jensen RL and Rogers RR, 1973a. Effect of waxy corn starch modification on growth, serum biochemical values and body composition of Pitman−Moore miniature pigs. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 11, 747–754. - PubMed
    1. Anderson TA, Fomon SJ and Andersen DW, 1973b. Unpublished data submitted to Corn Refiners Association, Inc., In: Cited in JECFA, 1982e.
    1. Annisson G, Illman RJ and Topping DL, 2003. Acetylated, propionylated or butyrylated starches raise large bowel short‐chain fatty acids preferentially when fed to rats. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3523–3528. - PubMed
    1. Anonymous , 1960. Caloric evaluation of RX12XI and cornstarch. Unpublished report of Food Research Laboratories, Inc. (Report No. 80878b‐e). Submitted to the World Health Organization by the National Starch and Chemical Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ, USA. Cited in JECFA, 1982g.

LinkOut - more resources