Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme maltogenic amylase from a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis (strain NZYM-SO)

EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

The food enzyme maltogenic amylase (glucan 1,4-α-maltohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.133) is produced with a genetically modified Bacillus subtilis strain NZYM-SO by Novozymes A/S. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production microorganism and recombinant DNA. This maltogenic amylase is intended to be used in baking processes. Based on the maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme-total organic Solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 0.556 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level at the mid-dose of 318.4 mg TOS/kg bw per day that, compared with the estimated dietary exposure, results in a sufficiently high margin of exposure (at least 570). Similarity of the amino acid sequence to those of known allergens was searched and three matches were found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood of such reactions to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.

Keywords: 4‐α‐d‐glucan α‐maltohydrolase; 4‐α‐maltohydrolase; Bacillus subtilis; EC 3.2.1.133; food enzyme; genetically modified microorganism; glucan 1; maltogenic amylase.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Armentia A, Dias‐Perales A, Castrodeza J, Dueñas‐Laita A, Palacin A and Fernándes S, 2009. Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant? Allergologia et Immunopathologia, 37, 203–204. 10.1016/j.aller.2009.05.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baur X and Czuppon AB, 1995. Allergic reaction after eating alpha‐amylase (Asp o 2)‐containing bred. A case report. Allergy, 50, 85–87. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1995.tb02487.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brisman J, 2002. Baker's asthma. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 498–502; quiz 502, 426. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisman J and Belin L, 1991. Clinical and immunological responses to occupational exposure to alpha‐amylase in the baking industry. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 48, 604–608. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cullinan P, Cook A, Jones M, Cannon J, Fitzgerald B and Newman Taylor AJ, 1997. Clinical responses to ingested fungal α‐amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus? Allergy, 52, 346–349. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb01003.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources