Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 11;17(12):e05838.
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5838. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Update of the risk assessment of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP) for use in food contact materials

Update of the risk assessment of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP) for use in food contact materials

EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP Panel) was asked by the European Commission to update its 2005 risk assessments of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP), which are authorised for use in plastic food contact material (FCM). Dietary exposure estimates (mean and high (P95)) were obtained by combining literature occurrence data with consumption data from the EFSA Comprehensive Database. The highest exposure was found for DINP, ranging from 0.2 to 4.3 and from 0.4 to 7.0 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day for mean and high consumers, respectively. There was not enough information to draw conclusions on how much migration from plastic FCM contributes to dietary exposure to phthalates. The review of the toxicological data focused mainly on reproductive effects. The CEP Panel derived the same critical effects and individual tolerable daily intakes (TDIs) (mg/kg bw per day) as in 2005 for all the phthalates, i.e. reproductive effects for DBP (0.01), BBP (0.5), DEHP (0.05), and liver effects for DINP and DIDP (0.15 each). Based on a plausible common mechanism (i.e. reduction in fetal testosterone) underlying the reproductive effects of DEHP, DBP and BBP, the Panel considered it appropriate to establish a group-TDI for these phthalates, taking DEHP as index compound as a basis for introducing relative potency factors. The Panel noted that DINP also affected fetal testosterone levels at doses around threefold higher than liver effects and therefore considered it conservative to include it within the group-TDI which was established to be 50 μg/kg bw per day, expressed as DEHP equivalents. The aggregated dietary exposure for DBP, BBP, DEHP and DINP was estimated to be 0.9-7.2 and 1.6-11.7 μg/kg bw per day for mean and high consumers, respectively, thus contributing up to 23% of the group-TDI in the worst-case scenario. For DIDP, not included in the group-TDI, dietary exposure was estimated to be always below 0.1 μg/kg bw per day and therefore far below the TDI of 150 μg/kg bw per day. This assessment covers European consumers of any age, including the most sensitive groups. Based on the limited scope of the mandate and the uncertainties identified, the Panel considered that the current assessment of the five phthalates, individually and collectively, should be on a temporary basis.

Keywords: BBP; DBP; DEHP; DIDP; DINP; food contact materials; phthalates; safety assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Major metabolic pathways of DEHP in Humans (adapted from Ito et al., 2014). See Table 21 for abbreviations

References

    1. Adamsson A, Slonena V, Parankoc J and Toppari J, 2009. Effects of maternal exposure to di‐isononylphthalate (DINP) and 1,1‐dichloro‐2,2‐bis(p‐chlorophenyl)ethylene (p, p’‐DDE) on steroidogenesis in the fetal rat testis and adrenal gland. Reproductive Toxicology, 28, 66–74. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmad R, Gautam AK, Verma Y, Sedha S and Kumar S, 2014. Effects of in utero di‐butyl phthalate and butyl benzyl phthalate exposure on offspring development and male reproduction of rat. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 3156–3165. 10.1007/s11356-013-2281-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amiridou D and Voutsa D, 2011. Alkylphenols and phthalates in bottled waters. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185, 281–286. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson WAC, Castle L, Scotter MJ, Massey RC and Springall C, 2001. A bio‐marker approach to measuring human dietary exposure to certain phthalate diesters. Food Additives & Contaminants, 18, 1068–1074. - PubMed
    1. Anderson WA, Castle L, Hird S, Jeffery J and Scotter MJ, 2011. A twenty‐volunteer study using deuterium labelling to determine the kinetics and fractional excretion of primary and secondary urinary metabolites of di‐2‐ethylhexylphthalate and di‐iso‐nonylphthalate. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49, 2022–2029. 10.1016/j.fct.2011.05.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources