Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 13;17(12):e05922.
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5922. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Opinion on the re-evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

Opinion on the re-evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

EFSA is re-evaluating the safety of food additives already permitted in the Union before 20 January 2009 and issuing scientific opinions on their safety in line with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. Acacia gum (E 414) was re-evaluated in 2017 by the former EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). As follow-up to this assessment, the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to assess the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as carry-over in food for infants below 16 weeks of age belonging to food categories 13.1.1 (Infant formulae) and 13.1.5.1 (Dietary foods for infants for special medical purposes and special formulae for infants) and to address the issues already identified during the re-evaluation of the food additive when used in food for the general population. The process involved the publication of a call for data to allow the interested parties to provide the requested information to complete the risk assessment. Based on the analytical data submitted in response to this call, the Panel recommended to lower the limits in the specifications for toxic elements and identified the need for further specifications for aluminium, microbiological criteria and protein residues. The Panel noted that information was not provided for oxidising enzymes and recommended that oxidases and peroxidases should be inactivated during the manufacturing process. The interested parties did not submit toxicological, clinical and post-marketing surveillance data specific for the assessment of the safety of acacia gum (E 414) in infants below 16 weeks of age. However, taking the highest doses tested without adverse effects from the subchronic studies available from the previous re-evaluation and comparing them with the estimated exposure in infants, the margins of safety were large indicating that there is no reason for health concern.

Keywords: Acacia gum; E 414; food additive; infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Billaud C, Lecornu D and Nicolas J, 1996. Substrates and carboxylic acid inhibitors of partially purified polyphenol oxidase from gum arabic. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 44, 1668–1675.
    1. Bliss DZ, Jung HJ, Savik K, Lowry A, LeMoine M, Jensen L and Schaffer K, 2001. Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence. Nursing Research, 50, 203–213. 10.1097/00006199-200107000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Binjumah M, Ajarem J, Ahmad M, 2018. Effects of the perinatal exposure of Gum Arabic on the development, behavior and biochemical parameters of mice offspring. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25(7), 1332–1338. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.04.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calame W, Weseler A, Viebke C, Flynn C and Siemensma A, 2008. Gum arabic establishes prebiotic functionality in healthy human volunteers in a dose‐dependent manner. British Journal of Nutrition, 100, 1269–1275. 10.1017/S0007114508981447 - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Committee related to uncertainties in dietary exposure assessment. EFSA Journal 2007;5(1):438, 54 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2007.438 - DOI