Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988 Oct;67(10):1334-7.
doi: 10.1177/00220345880670101701.

Electrical stimulation of salivary flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Electrical stimulation of salivary flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome

M Steller et al. J Dent Res. 1988 Oct.

Abstract

Patients with the salivary component of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) develop chronic xerostomia, which causes oral symptoms and functional impairment in approximate proportion to its severity. The purpose of this double-blind study was to determine whether an electrical stimulus applied to the tongue and hard palate by a battery-operated device (SAL II, Biosonics, Inc.) could stimulate salivary flow in subjects with generally severe SS. Twenty-nine patients with the salivary component of SS (diagnosed as the presence of focal chronic sialadenitis in a labial salivary gland biopsy specimen with a focus score of greater than 1 focus/4 mm2) were randomly assigned active or placebo devices, which they used for three minutes, three times a day for four weeks. Whole saliva flow rates were measured at weeks 0, 2, and 4 by collection of whole saliva both before and after stimulation with the device. Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The change in mean post-stimulation flow rate from week 0 to week 4 was greater for the 13 subjects using an active device (0.08 +/- S.D. 0.08 g/2 min, to 0.24 +/- 0.33 g/2 min) than for the 11 subjects using a placebo device (0.11 +/- 0.15 g/2 min, to 0.08 +/- 0.18 g/2 min) (p = 0.04). However, the magnitude of the mean difference was small, because three subjects using active devices responded and others did not. Only five subjects, all using active devices, reported a subjective increase in the amount of their saliva. The results of this study indicate that some SS patients with residual salivary flow show a significant response to electrical stimulation, but others with low or absent whole saliva flow rates do not respond.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources