Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;22(12):1933-1940.
doi: 10.1111/codi.15235. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Predicting outcomes of pelvic exenteration using machine learning

Collaborators

Predicting outcomes of pelvic exenteration using machine learning

PelvEx Collaborative. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: We aim to compare machine learning with neural network performance in predicting R0 resection (R0), length of stay > 14 days (LOS), major complication rates at 30 days postoperatively (COMP) and survival greater than 1 year (SURV) for patients having pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.

Method: A deep learning computer was built and the programming environment was established. The PelvEx Collaborative database was used which contains anonymized data on patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or locally recurrent colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2014. Logistic regression, a support vector machine and an artificial neural network (ANN) were trained. Twenty per cent of the data were used as a test set for calculating prediction accuracy for R0, LOS, COMP and SURV. Model performance was measured by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).

Results: Machine learning models and ANNs were trained on 1147 cases. The AUROC for all outcome predictions ranged from 0.608 to 0.793 indicating modest to moderate predictive ability. The models performed best at predicting LOS > 14 days with an AUROC of 0.793 using preoperative and operative data. Visualized logistic regression model weights indicate a varying impact of variables on the outcome in question.

Conclusion: This paper highlights the potential for predictive modelling of large international databases. Current data allow moderate predictive ability of both complex ANNs and more classic methods.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; artificial neural network; colorectal surgery; machine learning; pelvic exenteration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1347-58.
    1. Adams K, Papagrigoriadis S. Creation of an effective colorectal anastomotic leak early detection tool using an artificial neural network. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29: 437-43.
    1. Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer 1997; 79: 857-62.
    1. Anand SS, Smith AE, Hamilton PW, Anand JS, Hughes JG, Bartels PH. An evaluation of intelligent prognostic systems for colorectal cancer. Artif Intell Med 1999; 15: 193-214.
    1. Horta AB, Salgado C, Fernandes M et al. Clinical decision support tool for co-management signalling. Int J Med Inform 2018; 113: 56-62.

LinkOut - more resources