Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;53(2):e13718.
doi: 10.1111/and.13718. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Comparative analysis of tests used to assess sperm chromatin integrity and DNA fragmentation

Sulagna Dutta  1 , Ralf Henkel  2   3 , Ashok Agarwal  3
Affiliations
Review

Comparative analysis of tests used to assess sperm chromatin integrity and DNA fragmentation

Sulagna Dutta et al. Andrologia. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Male infertility has a complex etiology, and many times, the cause is unknown. While routine semen analysis provides an overview of basic semen parameters, such as sperm concentration, motility, viability and morphology, a significant overlap of these parameters has been reported in fertile and infertile men. Moreover, conventional semen parameters do not reveal the cellular or molecular mechanisms of sperm dysfunctions leading to infertility. Therefore, sperm functional parameters, including sperm chromatin integrity, are evaluated to provide information on subtle sperm defects that are not routinely identified. Incomplete or defective sperm chromatin condensation increases the susceptibility of the sperm DNA to oxidative damage or other factors. To evaluate sperm chromatin integrity, different methods with varying degrees of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities are available. Among these assays, SCSA, TUNEL and SCD assays are most commonly used. While these assays rather evaluate the DNA directly for damages, the aniline blue and chromomycin A3 stains test for the quality of chromatin condensation. Thus, this review discusses and compares different methods used to evaluate sperm chromatin integrity and condensation, and their inclusion in the routine evaluation of the male infertility.

Keywords: ART outcomes; TUNEL assay; male infertility; oxidative stress; sperm DNA fragmentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abdelbaki, S. A., Sabry, J. H., Al-Adl, A. M., & Sabry, H. H. (2017). The impact of coexisting sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal oxidative stress on the outcome of varicocelectomy in infertile patients: A prospective controlled study. Arab Journal of Urology, 15(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.03.002
    1. Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., & Esteves, S. C. (2016). Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation? Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28(3), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000271
    1. Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., Esteves, S. C., & Majzoub, A. (2017a). Current limitation and future perspective of sperm DNA fragmentation tests. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6(Suppl 4), S549-S552. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.05.11
    1. Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., Esteves, S. C., & Majzoub, A. (2017b). Implication of sperm processing during assisted reproduction on sperm DNA integrity. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6, S583-S585.
    1. Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., Majzoub, A., & Esteves, S. C. (2017c). The Society for Translational Medicine: Clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Translational Andrology and Urology, 6, S720-S733.

LinkOut - more resources